国际生殖健康/计划生育 ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 377-381.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

手术切除肌瘤后妊娠与合并肌瘤妊娠结局的差异性研究

周宇佳,孙玉琴,蒋晓敏   

  1. 230001  合肥,安徽医科大学附属妇幼保健院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-23 修回日期:2020-07-06 出版日期:2020-09-15 发布日期:2020-09-11
  • 通讯作者: 孙玉琴,E-mail:2721179482@qq.com;蒋晓敏,E-mail:530425973@qq.com E-mail:2721179482@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省重点研究与开发计划项目(201904a07020008)

Difference of Pregnancy Outcomes between Pregnancy after Myomectomy and Pregnancy Complicated by Myoma

ZHOU Yu-jia,SUN Yu-qin,JIANG Xiao-min   

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Anhui Medical University,Hefei 230001,China
  • Received:2020-04-23 Revised:2020-07-06 Published:2020-09-15 Online:2020-09-11
  • Contact: SUN Yu-qin,E-mail:2721179482@qq.com;JIANG Xiao-min,E-mail:530425973@qq.com E-mail:2721179482@qq.com

摘要: 目的:对比分析手术切除子宫肌瘤后妊娠与合并肌瘤妊娠结局的差异。方法:以2009年10月—2017年12月于安徽医科大学附属妇幼保健院以手术方式切除子宫肌瘤,并且术后成功分娩的产妇为术后妊娠组(106例),选取同期于此院分娩的合并肌瘤孕妇为合并妊娠组(145例),收集并比较分析2组孕妇基本信息、肌瘤的临床特征、分娩方式及妊娠结局。结果:2组孕妇年龄、户口分布、学历分布、流产史和分娩史比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。2组孕妇单发性肌瘤、肌壁间子宫肌瘤发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05),黏膜下、浆膜下子宫肌瘤发生率和肌瘤最大径线比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。子宫肌瘤术后妊娠组早产、前置胎盘发生率高于合并子宫肌瘤妊娠组(均P<0.05)。2组孕妇受孕方式、分娩方式、胎位异常、胎儿窘迫、胎盘植入、胎膜早破、新生儿窒息、产后出血、产后24 h出血量、低出生体质量儿、新生儿出生体质量比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论:手术切除子宫肌瘤虽可改善部分患者生育功能,但其术后需要较长的避孕时间,同时存在增加早产、前置胎盘发生率等不利影响,而合并肌瘤妊娠者较肌瘤切除术后妊娠者不良妊娠结局发生率未明显增加,故有生育需求的患者可以考虑保守治疗及合并子宫肌瘤妊娠。

关键词: 子宫肌瘤切除术;, 肌瘤;, 妊娠;, 妊娠结局;, 子宫破裂

Abstract: Objective: To analyze the difference of pregnancy outcome between pregnancy after myomectomy and pregnancy complicated by myoma. Methods:The pregnant women who underwent myomectomy in Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Anhui Medical University from October 2009 to December 2017 were selected as the postoperative pregnancy group (106 cases). Pregnant women with myoma who were delivered in this hospital in the same period were selected as the myoma-complicated pregnancy group (145 cases). Demographic data, clinical characteristics of myoma, delivery methods and pregnancy outcomes of the two groups were collected and analyzed. Results:There were no significant differences in the distribution of maternal age, household registration, educational level and previous abortion or delivery history between the two groups (all P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the proportion of single myoma and intramural myoma between the two groups (P>0.05). The differences in the proportion of submucosal, subserosal uterine myoma and the maximum diameter of myoma between the two groups were statistically significant (all P<0.05). The incidences of preterm delivery and placenta previa in the postoperative pregnancy group were significantly higher than those in the myoma-complicated pregnancy group (all P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the conception method, delivery method, abnormal presentation, fetal distress, placental accreta, premature rupture of membranes, neonatal asphyxialow, postpartum hemorrhage, postpartum blood loss in 24 hours, low birth weight and neonate birth weight between the two groups (all P>0.05). Conclusions:Although myomectomy can improve the reproductive function in some patients, it requires a longer contraceptive time after surgery, and myomectomy has adverse effects such as increasing the incidence of preterm labor and placenta previa. Moreover, the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in pregnant patients with myoma is not significantly higher than that in those pregnant patients after myomectomy. Therefore, patients with reproductive needs may consider the conservative treatment and pregnancy with myoma.

Key words:  Uterine myomectomy;, Myoma;, Pregnancy;, Pregnancy outcome;, Uterine rupture