Objective: To analyze the clinical characteristics and prognosis of cervical mucinous adenocarcinoma. Methods: The data of the patients diagnosed with cervical mucinous adenocarcinoma and cervical usual-type adenocarcinoma from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results(SEER) database, from 2000 to 2021, was retrospectively collected. The clinical characteristics and prognosis were analyzed and compared. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, and Cox proportional hazards regression was employed to analyze the prognostic factors. Results: A total of 9 404 patients with cervical adenocarcinoma were included, among which 917 had mucinous adenocarcinoma and 8 487 had usual-type adenocarcinoma. The comparison of age at diagnosis, race, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 staging, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) staging, tumor diameter, lymph node metastasis status, and treatment modalities (surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy) between patients with cervical mucinous adenocarcinoma and those with usual-type adenocarcinoma showed statistically significant differences (all P<0.05). Compared to the patients with usual-type adenocarcinoma, the patients with cervical mucinous adenocarcinoma had a higher proportion of Asian or Pacific Islander patients (14.2% vs. 10.5%), a higher proportion of locally advanced (42.1% vs. 36.7%) and metastatic (17.2% vs. 9.8%) patients, and a higher rate of lymph node metastasis (22.4% vs. 14.8%). For early-stage patients, surgical intervention was the main treatment method for both histological types; for locally advanced and metastatic patients, non-surgical treatments (chemotherapy and radiotherapy) were predominant, with a higher treatment rate for mucinous adenocarcinoma patients. The overall survival (OS) of patients with cervical mucinous adenocarcinoma was significantly shorter, particularly in early and locally advanced patients (both P<0.01). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that older age, higher FIGO stage, and larger tumor diameter were independent risk factors for OS in the patients with cervical mucinous adenocarcinoma, while surgery and chemotherapy were independent protective factors. Surgery improved OS in the patients with cervical mucinous adenocarcinoma across different stages (all P<0.05). Conclusions: Compared to usual-type adenocarcinoma, cervical mucinous adenocarcinoma has worse prognosis, higher tendency for lymph node and distant metastasis. Surgical intervention can improve the OS of patients with mucinous adenocarcinoma, and has a certain protective effect on the locally advanced patients.