国际生殖健康/计划生育 ›› 2010, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 139-144.

• 观点 • 上一篇    下一篇

精液分析实践:A~Z

Brazil C   

  1. Center for Health and the Environment,University of California,Davis,CA 95616,USA
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2010-05-15 发布日期:2010-05-15

Practical Semen Analysis:From A to Z

Brazil C   

  1. Center for Health and the Environment,University of California,Davis,CA 95616,USA
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2010-05-15 Online:2010-05-15

摘要: 准确的精液分析不仅对制订患者的治疗方案,而且对研究精液质量总体变化趋势、避孕效果和毒理作用都至关重要。导致精液分析标准化困难的原因有:精液分析缺乏可比较的客观标准,需要技术人员主观评定;技术人员缺乏培训;实验室的检测能力(PT)存在问题;实验室不愿意改变现有技术等。第5 版《世界卫生组织人类精液分析实验室技术手册》提供了全面改进的标准流程,详尽地纠正了大量误解。然而仅从文字和图片上学习,效果有限。WHO专门编辑出版了一部DVD,为每项技术提供质量控制方法与标准示范,其中包括评估精子活力、形态和密度质量标准,这将提高手册的使用效率。然而,只有手册和DVD 还不够,还有待于对建立标准化的技术和严格实施质量控制的重要性达成共识,并确保在实验室中完全按照该手册操作,而不仅仅是报道各实验室自己如何操作。除非精液分析得到改进,否则患者的诊疗质量将始终难以提高,而且比较不同实验室之间的研究结果,价值也会很有限。

关键词: 男科学实验室, 质量保证, 精液分析, 精子密度, 精子形态, 精子活力

Abstract: Accurate semen analysis is critical for decisions about patient care,as well as for studies addressing overall changes in semen quality,contraceptive efficacy and effects of toxicant exposure. The standardization of semen analysis is very difficult for many reasons,including the use of subjective techniques with no standards for comparison,poor technician training,problems with proficiency testing and a reluctance to change techniques. The World Health Organization(WHO)Semen handbook(2010)offers a vastly improved set of standardized procedures,all at a level of detail that will preclude most isinterpretations. However,there is a limit to what can be learned from words and pictures alone. A WHO-produced DVD that offers complete demonstrations of each technique along with quality assurance standards for motility,morphology and
concentration assessments would enhance the effectiveness of the manual. However,neither the manual nor a DVD will help unless there is general acknowledgement of the critical need to standardize techniques and
rigorously pursue quality control to ensure that laboratories actually perform techniques ‘according to WHO’ instead of merely reporting that they have done so. Unless improvements are made,patient results will continue to be compromised and comparison between studies and laboratories will have limited merit.

Key words: Andrology laboratory, Quality assurance, Semen analysis, Sperm concentration, Sperm morphology, Sperm motility