国际生殖健康/计划生育 ›› 2010, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 168-177.

• 观点 • 上一篇    下一篇

《世界卫生组织人类精液分析实验室技术手册》第5 版中低正常精子形态值的临床意义

Menkveld R   

  1. Andrology Laboratory,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,Tygerberg Academic Hospital and University of Stellenbosch,Tygerberg 7505,South Africa
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2010-05-15 发布日期:2010-05-15

Clinical Significance of the Low Normal SpermMorphology Value as Proposed in the Fifth Edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen

Menkveld R   

  1. Andrology Laboratory,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,Tygerberg Academic Hospital and University of Stellenbosch,Tygerberg 7505,South Africa
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2010-05-15 Online:2010-05-15

摘要: 第5 版《世界卫生组织人类精液分析实验室技术手册》中提出4%这一非常低的正常精子形态临界值与近期发表的数值和报道中正常精子形态平均值下降趋势一致。导致正常形态精子比例下降的可能原因很多。首先是引进了评估精子形态的严格标准。其他的原因可能包括采用另外的标准定义精子形态异常,诸多负面环境因素导致的精液参数下降。虽然同原先使用的严格评估精子形态的标准一样,新引入的非常低的正常值本身并不能提供强有力的预测值来评价男性生殖潜能,但是如果将全面、严格的评价精子形态的方法与其他可行的精子形态参数一起应用,仍然可得到一个良好的预测值,已知有一些形态参数对精子异常有很强的预测与预后判断作用。此外,更好的方法学国际标准化,精子形态评估标准解释的一致性及标准的国际室间质量控制(EQC)计划对保证精子形态预测值的精确性极为重要。

关键词: 男性生殖潜能, 正常临界值, 精液分析, 精子形态学评估, 严格标准, 世界卫生组织手册

Abstract: The very low cut-off value for sperm morphology of 4%morphologically normal spermatozoa,as proposed in the new edition of the World Health Organization (WHO)manual on semen analysis,is in agreement with recently published values and reflects the trend of a decline in reported mean values for normal
sperm morphology. The reduced value for morphologically normal spermatozoa over the years may be due to several factors. The first is the introduction of strict criteria for the evaluation of sperm morphology. Other reasons may include the introduction of additional criteria for sperm morphology abnormalities and the suggested decrease in semen parameters because of increasing negative environmental influences. Although on its own the newly proposed very low normal value may not provide the strong predictive value for a males’ fertility potential,as originally reported for sperm morphology evaluated according to strict criteria,a good predictive value can still be obtained if the holistic,strict approach for sperm morphology evaluation is
followed together with additional sperm morphology parameters now available,because certain morphology patterns and sperm abnormalities are now known to be of strong prognostic value. In addition,better international standardization of the technical methodology, consensus on the interpretation of sperm morphology evaluation criteria and standardized international external quality control(EQC)schemes,are of utmost importance to maintain the good predictive value of sperm morphology.

Key words: Male fertility potential, Normal cut-off values, Semen analysis, Sperm morphology evaluation, Strict criteria, WHO manual