Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2): 110-115.doi: 10.12280/gjszjk.20240416
• Original Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
LU Jue-yun, LI Xin, JI Hui, ZHAO Chun, ZHANG Jun-qiang, LING Xiu-feng()
Received:
2024-08-29
Published:
2025-03-15
Online:
2025-03-10
Contact:
LING Xiu-feng, E-mail: LU Jue-yun, LI Xin, JI Hui, ZHAO Chun, ZHANG Jun-qiang, LING Xiu-feng. Effect of Half-Dose Antagonist on Pregnancy Outcomes of IVF/ICSI[J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2025, 44(2): 110-115.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
组别 | n | 年龄(岁) | BMI(kg/m2) | E2(pg/mL) | P(ng/mL) | FSH(U/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
半剂量组 | 1 796 | 30.09±4.06 | 22.43±2.47 | 38.13(27.00,52.00) | 0.57(0.30,0.90) | 7.57±2.24 |
常规剂量组 | 1 796 | 30.08±3.99 | 22.42±2.51 | 39.00(28.90,54.00) | 0.56(0.30,0.90) | 7.53±2.09 |
t或Z | 0.037 | 0.026 | -2.693 | -0.456 | 0.536 | |
P | 0.970 | 0.979 | 0.007 | 0.649 | 0.592 | |
组别 | n | LH(U/L) | T(ng/dL) | PRL(ng/mL) | AMH(ng/mL) | 基础AFC(个) |
半剂量组 | 1 796 | 3.54(2.70,4.60) | 0.42(0.30,0.60) | 14.18(10.50,19.20) | 3.42(2.00,5.70) | 9.68±3.98 |
常规剂量组 | 1 796 | 3.56(2.70,4.60) | 0.41(0.30,0.50) | 14.61(10.40,20.00) | 3.43(2.00,5.60) | 9.61±3.77 |
t或Z | -1.089 | -0.971 | -1.427 | -0.281 | 0.517 | |
P | 0.276 | 0.331 | 0.154 | 0.779 | 0.605 |
组别 | n | 年龄(岁) | BMI(kg/m2) | E2(pg/mL) | P(ng/mL) | FSH(U/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
半剂量组 | 1 796 | 30.09±4.06 | 22.43±2.47 | 38.13(27.00,52.00) | 0.57(0.30,0.90) | 7.57±2.24 |
常规剂量组 | 1 796 | 30.08±3.99 | 22.42±2.51 | 39.00(28.90,54.00) | 0.56(0.30,0.90) | 7.53±2.09 |
t或Z | 0.037 | 0.026 | -2.693 | -0.456 | 0.536 | |
P | 0.970 | 0.979 | 0.007 | 0.649 | 0.592 | |
组别 | n | LH(U/L) | T(ng/dL) | PRL(ng/mL) | AMH(ng/mL) | 基础AFC(个) |
半剂量组 | 1 796 | 3.54(2.70,4.60) | 0.42(0.30,0.60) | 14.18(10.50,19.20) | 3.42(2.00,5.70) | 9.68±3.98 |
常规剂量组 | 1 796 | 3.56(2.70,4.60) | 0.41(0.30,0.50) | 14.61(10.40,20.00) | 3.43(2.00,5.60) | 9.61±3.77 |
t或Z | -1.089 | -0.971 | -1.427 | -0.281 | 0.517 | |
P | 0.276 | 0.331 | 0.154 | 0.779 | 0.605 |
组别 | n | Gn启动剂量(U) | Gn总剂量(U) | Gn总天数(d) | 拮抗剂总剂量(mg) | 拮抗剂总天数(d) | hCG日内膜厚度(mm) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
半剂量组 | 1 796 | 232.68±38.00 | 2 121.71±492.23 | 8.91±1.35 | 0.38(0.30,0.50) | 3.00(2.00,4.00) | 10.20±2.53 | ||
常规剂量组 | 1 796 | 232.91±38.06 | 2 094.02±510.35 | 8.75±1.35 | 1.00(0.80,1.00) | 4.00(3.00,4.00) | 10.36±2.55 | ||
t或Z或χ2 | -0.181 | 1.655 | 3.599 | -42.947 | -5.600 | -1.911 | |||
P | 0.856 | 0.098 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.056 | |||
组别 | n | hCG日E2(pg/mL) | hCG日P(ng/mL) | hCG日FSH(U/L) | hCG日LH(U/L) | LH早发峰发生率 | |||
半剂量组 | 1 796 | 3 483.00(2 040.00,4 901.00) | 1.13(0.80,1.60) | 15.67(12.80,19.50) | 1.77(1.20,2.60) | 0.33(6/1 796) | |||
常规剂量组 | 1 796 | 3 328.00(2 014.50,4 839.00) | 1.20(0.90,1.60) | 16.21(13.00,19.80) | 2.09(1.40,3.20) | 0.78(14/1 796) | |||
t或Z或χ2 | -1.322 | -3.024 | -2.103 | -7.861 | 0.821 | ||||
P | 0.186 | 0.002 | 0.035 | <0.001 | 0.365 |
组别 | n | Gn启动剂量(U) | Gn总剂量(U) | Gn总天数(d) | 拮抗剂总剂量(mg) | 拮抗剂总天数(d) | hCG日内膜厚度(mm) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
半剂量组 | 1 796 | 232.68±38.00 | 2 121.71±492.23 | 8.91±1.35 | 0.38(0.30,0.50) | 3.00(2.00,4.00) | 10.20±2.53 | ||
常规剂量组 | 1 796 | 232.91±38.06 | 2 094.02±510.35 | 8.75±1.35 | 1.00(0.80,1.00) | 4.00(3.00,4.00) | 10.36±2.55 | ||
t或Z或χ2 | -0.181 | 1.655 | 3.599 | -42.947 | -5.600 | -1.911 | |||
P | 0.856 | 0.098 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.056 | |||
组别 | n | hCG日E2(pg/mL) | hCG日P(ng/mL) | hCG日FSH(U/L) | hCG日LH(U/L) | LH早发峰发生率 | |||
半剂量组 | 1 796 | 3 483.00(2 040.00,4 901.00) | 1.13(0.80,1.60) | 15.67(12.80,19.50) | 1.77(1.20,2.60) | 0.33(6/1 796) | |||
常规剂量组 | 1 796 | 3 328.00(2 014.50,4 839.00) | 1.20(0.90,1.60) | 16.21(13.00,19.80) | 2.09(1.40,3.20) | 0.78(14/1 796) | |||
t或Z或χ2 | -1.322 | -3.024 | -2.103 | -7.861 | 0.821 | ||||
P | 0.186 | 0.002 | 0.035 | <0.001 | 0.365 |
组别 | n | 获卵数 | 2PN受精率 | 卵裂率 | 可利用胚胎数 | 可利用胚胎率 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
半剂量组 | 1 796 | 9.00(6.00,12.00) | 75.32(12 743/16 919) | 99.43(12 671/12 743) | 6.00(3.00,9.00) | 89.25(11 309/12 671) |
常规剂量组 | 1 796 | 9.00(6.00,12.00) | 75.66(12 548/16 584) | 99.25(12 454/12 548) | 6.00(3.00,9.00) | 92.07(11 467/12 454) |
t或Z | -1.469 | 0.541 | 3.287 | -1.124 | 59.092 | |
P | 0.142 | 0.462 | 0.070 | 0.261 | <0.001 | |
组别 | n | D3优质胚胎数 | D3优质胚胎率 | 形成囊胚数 | 高评分囊胚数 | 高评分囊胚率 |
半剂量组 | 1 796 | 3.00(1.00,6.00) | 58.56(7 420/12 671) | 2.00(0.00,4.00) | 1.00(0.00,2.00) | 53.72(2 695/5 011) |
常规剂量组 | 1 796 | 4.00(2.00,6.00) | 63.08(7 856/12 454) | 2.00(0.00,5.00) | 1.00(0.00,2.00) | 55.07(2 932/5 324) |
t或Z | -2.845 | 53.869 | -2.513 | -2.737 | 1.731 | |
P | 0.004 | <0.001 | 0.012 | 0.006 | 0.188 |
组别 | n | 获卵数 | 2PN受精率 | 卵裂率 | 可利用胚胎数 | 可利用胚胎率 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
半剂量组 | 1 796 | 9.00(6.00,12.00) | 75.32(12 743/16 919) | 99.43(12 671/12 743) | 6.00(3.00,9.00) | 89.25(11 309/12 671) |
常规剂量组 | 1 796 | 9.00(6.00,12.00) | 75.66(12 548/16 584) | 99.25(12 454/12 548) | 6.00(3.00,9.00) | 92.07(11 467/12 454) |
t或Z | -1.469 | 0.541 | 3.287 | -1.124 | 59.092 | |
P | 0.142 | 0.462 | 0.070 | 0.261 | <0.001 | |
组别 | n | D3优质胚胎数 | D3优质胚胎率 | 形成囊胚数 | 高评分囊胚数 | 高评分囊胚率 |
半剂量组 | 1 796 | 3.00(1.00,6.00) | 58.56(7 420/12 671) | 2.00(0.00,4.00) | 1.00(0.00,2.00) | 53.72(2 695/5 011) |
常规剂量组 | 1 796 | 4.00(2.00,6.00) | 63.08(7 856/12 454) | 2.00(0.00,5.00) | 1.00(0.00,2.00) | 55.07(2 932/5 324) |
t或Z | -2.845 | 53.869 | -2.513 | -2.737 | 1.731 | |
P | 0.004 | <0.001 | 0.012 | 0.006 | 0.188 |
组别 | n | 移植胚胎类型 | 移植胚胎数 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D3卵裂期胚胎 | D5囊胚 | 1枚 | 2枚 | 3枚 | ||||||||
半剂量组 | 178 | 98.31(175/178) | 1.69(3/178) | 5.62(10/178) | 86.52(154/178) | 7.87(14/178) | ||||||
常规剂量组 | 178 | 94.94(169/178) | 5.06(9/178) | 8.99(16/178) | 84.27(150/178) | 6.74(12/178) | ||||||
χ2 | 3.105 | 1.591 | ||||||||||
P | 0.078 | 0.451 | ||||||||||
组别 | n | 移植囊胚优囊占比 | 移植卵裂期优胚占比 | |||||||||
半剂量组 | 178 | 75.00(3/4) | 73.88(263/356) | |||||||||
常规剂量组 | 178 | 100.00(10/10) | 81.87(280/342) | |||||||||
χ2 | 0.106 | 0.806 | ||||||||||
P | 0.745 | 0.369 | ||||||||||
组别 | n | 生化妊娠率 | 着床率 | 临床妊娠率 | 活产率 | 流产类型 | ||||||
早期流产 | 晚期流产 | |||||||||||
半剂量组 | 178 | 56.18(100/178) | 32.28(112/358) | 51.12(91/178) | 44.94(80/178) | 7.29(7/96) | 4.08(4/96) | |||||
常规剂量组 | 178 | 55.06(98/178) | 33.81(119/352) | 49.44(88/178) | 43.82(78/178) | 8.99(8/89) | 2.25(2/89) | |||||
χ2 | 0.046 | 0.514 | 0.033 | 0.046 | 0.687 | |||||||
P | 0.831 | 0.473 | 0.855 | 0.831 | 0.407 |
组别 | n | 移植胚胎类型 | 移植胚胎数 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D3卵裂期胚胎 | D5囊胚 | 1枚 | 2枚 | 3枚 | ||||||||
半剂量组 | 178 | 98.31(175/178) | 1.69(3/178) | 5.62(10/178) | 86.52(154/178) | 7.87(14/178) | ||||||
常规剂量组 | 178 | 94.94(169/178) | 5.06(9/178) | 8.99(16/178) | 84.27(150/178) | 6.74(12/178) | ||||||
χ2 | 3.105 | 1.591 | ||||||||||
P | 0.078 | 0.451 | ||||||||||
组别 | n | 移植囊胚优囊占比 | 移植卵裂期优胚占比 | |||||||||
半剂量组 | 178 | 75.00(3/4) | 73.88(263/356) | |||||||||
常规剂量组 | 178 | 100.00(10/10) | 81.87(280/342) | |||||||||
χ2 | 0.106 | 0.806 | ||||||||||
P | 0.745 | 0.369 | ||||||||||
组别 | n | 生化妊娠率 | 着床率 | 临床妊娠率 | 活产率 | 流产类型 | ||||||
早期流产 | 晚期流产 | |||||||||||
半剂量组 | 178 | 56.18(100/178) | 32.28(112/358) | 51.12(91/178) | 44.94(80/178) | 7.29(7/96) | 4.08(4/96) | |||||
常规剂量组 | 178 | 55.06(98/178) | 33.81(119/352) | 49.44(88/178) | 43.82(78/178) | 8.99(8/89) | 2.25(2/89) | |||||
χ2 | 0.046 | 0.514 | 0.033 | 0.046 | 0.687 | |||||||
P | 0.831 | 0.473 | 0.855 | 0.831 | 0.407 |
[1] | 中国女医师协会生殖医学专业委员会专家共识编写组. 辅助生殖领域拮抗剂方案标准化应用专家共识[J]. 中华生殖与避孕杂志, 2022, 42(2):109-116. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101441-20211108-00495. |
[2] | Xu B, Wang J, Xia L, et al. Increased Uterine NK cell numbers and perforin expression during the implantation phase in IVF Cycles with GnRH Antagonist Protocol[J]. Sci Rep, 2017,7:39912. doi: 10.1038/srep39912. |
[3] | Labarta E, Martínez-Conejero JA, Alamá P, et al. Endometrial receptivity is affected in women with high circulating progesterone levels at the end of the follicular phase: a functional genomics analysis[J]. Hum Reprod, 2011, 26(7):1813-1825. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der126. |
[4] | Hsieh YY, Chang CC, Tsai HD. Comparisons of different dosages of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist, short-acting form and single, half-dose, long-acting form of GnRH agonist during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and in vitro fertilization[J]. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 47(1):66-74. doi: 10.1016/S1028-4559(08)60057-1. |
[5] | Feng L, Fan R, Jiang A, et al. The effect of flexible low-dose GnRH antagonist on pregnancy outcome in the fresh embryo transfer cycle of IVF-ET: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 2022, 20(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12958-022-00927-0. |
[6] | 中国医师协会生殖医学专业委员会. 人类卵裂期胚胎及囊胚形态学评价中国专家共识[J]. 中华生殖与避孕杂志, 2022, 42(12):1218-1225. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101441-20220619-00266. |
[7] | Durnerin CI, Erb K, Fleming R, et al. Effects of recombinant LH treatment on folliculogenesis and responsiveness to FSH stimulation[J]. Hum Reprod, 2008, 23(2):421-426. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem388. |
[8] | Calhaz-Jorge C, De Geyter CH, Kupka MS, et al. Survey on ART and IUI: legislation, regulation, funding and registries in European countries: The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)[J]. Hum Reprod Open, 2020, 2020(1):hoz044. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoz044. |
[9] | 彭露, 刘玲, 汤鲜, 等. GnRH拮抗剂方案和GnRH激动剂长方案对IVF-ET/ICSI患者疗效及安全性的影响[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2021, 36(8):1805-1808. doi: 10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2021.08.032. |
[10] | Al-Inany HG, Youssef MA, Ayeleke RO, et al. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted reproductive technology[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2016, 4(4):CD001750. doi: 10.002/14651858.CD001750.pub4. |
[11] |
Kadhel P, Olivennes F, Fernandez H, et al. Are there still obstetric and perinatal benefits for selective embryo reduction of triplet pregnancies?[J]. Hum Reprod, 1998, 13(12):3555-3559. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.12.3555.
pmid: 9886549 |
[12] | 郭红宇, 高云荷. GnRH类似物的研究进展[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2005, 21(11):694-696. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2216.2005.11.024. |
[13] | Chen CD, Chiang YT, Yang PK, et al. Frequency of low serum LH is associated with increased early pregnancy loss in IVF/ICSI cycles[J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2016, 33(4):449-457. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.07.001. |
[14] | 许定飞. GnRH拮抗剂方案影响人子宫内膜容受性的作用机制研究[D]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2022. |
[15] | 赫少菁, 张倩杰, 明蕾, 等. 拮抗剂总剂量对卵巢正常反应人群IVF/ICSI妊娠结局的影响[J]. 生殖医学杂志, 2023, 32(7):984-990. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3845.2023.07.003. |
[16] | 简启亮, 王芳. 子宫内膜异位症对卵母细胞和胚胎发育的影响机制研究进展[J]. 生殖医学杂志, 2023, 32(10):1592-1596.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-3845.2023.10.024 |
[17] | Woo J, Kwon H, Choi D, et al. Effects of Elevated Progesterone Levels on the Day of hCG on the Quality of Oocyte and Embryo[J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 11(15): 4319. doi:10.3390/jcm11154319. |
[18] | Catteau-Jonard S, Brunel A, Dumont A, et al. Serum FSH level is lower in dysovulating than in ovulating non-PCOS obese women, independently of body mass index[J]. Ann Endocrinol(Paris), 2019, 80(4):225-228. doi: 10.1016/j.ando.2018.11.003. |
[19] | 徐玲, 刘尧芳. COH过程中雌二醇下降对拮抗剂方案IVF-ET助孕结局的影响[J]. 生殖医学杂志, 2023, 32(11):1637-1642. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3845.2023.11.004. |
[20] | 吴华颖, 王卓然, 王明磊, 等. 人绒毛膜促性腺激素日雌激素水平对胚胎质量和妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中国计划生育和妇产科, 2021, 13(1):59-62. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4020.2021.01.15. |
[21] | Zhao Y, Lian F, Xiang S, et al. Effects of half-dose and full-dose GnRH antagonists on IVF-ET outcomes: a retrospective study[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2021, 21(1):727. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04176-8. |
[22] | 叶英, 王雪敏, 刘苗苗. 不孕症妇女BMI及TSH水平与性激素水平的相关性[J]. 中国实用医刊, 2020, 47(17):27-29. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115689-20200414-01679. |
[23] | 王丽, 王月莺, 周芬, 等. 促性腺激素释放激素拮抗齐对子宫内膜容受性影响的研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(6):629-635. doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2023.06.002. |
[1] | XU Shan, MENG Jiang-ping. Research Progress on Sperm DNA Damage in Assisted Reproductive Technology [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2025, 44(1): 71-77. |
[2] | XIAO Nan, LI Yong-cheng, YAO Yi-ming, SUN Hong-wen, YAO Ru-qiang, CHEN Yong-jun, YIN Yu-chen, LUO Hai-ning. Associations between Phthalates Exposure and Inflammatory Cytokines in Ovarian Microenvironment [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(5): 353-360. |
[3] | XIE Yu-xin, WANG Rui-xue, CHEN Meng-na, CHU Ji-jun. The Role of Annexin A Family at Maternal-Fetal Interface and Related Adverse Pregnancy [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(5): 430-434. |
[4] | WU Yu-xuan, MENG Zi-fan, DONG Li, JI Hui. The Effect of Time Interval between Hysteroscopic Polypectomy and Start of Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles on Pregnancy Outcomes [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(4): 274-278. |
[5] | ZHANG Ai-yu, LUAN Cui-yu, WANG Dong-mei, JIANG Shuai. Analysis on the Status Quo and Influencing Factors of Medical Treatment Delay in Infertility Patients Undergoing IVF-ET [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(3): 190-194. |
[6] | GU Xu-zhao, SHEN Hao-fei, GAO Min, LIU A-hui, WANG Na, YANG Wen-jing, ZHANG Xue-hong. Didelphic Uterus Combined with Ovarian Pregnancy:A Case Report [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(2): 118-120. |
[7] | HAO Jia-li, HE Yu-jie. Evaluation of Fertility Quality of Life in Infertile Population and Analysis of Influencing Factors [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(2): 159-165. |
[8] | LIANG Jun-xia, YANG Yu-jie, ZHANG Li, GE Li-na, WANG Na-na, TIAN Ying, LIU Peng, YAN Meng. Risk Factors of Unusable Embryos for IVF/ICSI in Older Women [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(1): 1-6. |
[9] | NIU Guo-yan, XIONG Zheng-fang. Research Progress on Analgesic Methods for Transvaginal Ultrasound-Guided Oocyte Retrieval [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2023, 42(6): 507-512. |
[10] | CHEN Yin, WANG Jing, MAO Yun-dong. Research Progress of the Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Protocols for Women with Endometriosis-Related Infertility [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2023, 42(5): 398-402. |
[11] | YAO Ru-qiang, WANG Xin-yan, DIAO Jun-rong, ZHANG Xing-xing, ZHANG Yun-shan, LUO Hai-ning. Effect of Cesarean Section History on Cumulative Live Birth Rate Following IVF/ICSI-ET [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2023, 42(3): 177-183. |
[12] | CHEN Qiu-yan, LU Nan, LIU Jia-yin. Clinical Application of Growth Hormone Supplementation in Non-DOR Patients with Previous IVF/ICSI Failure [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2023, 42(3): 184-188. |
[13] | WANG Chun-yan, WANG Jie-yu, CHENG Jing-xian, WANG Yin-shuang, LUO Gui-ying. Assisted Reproductive Technology and Offspring Safety [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2023, 42(3): 226-230. |
[14] | ZHANG Xiao-lan, WU Xun, CAO Shan-ren, ZHANG Jun-qiang, LING Xiu-feng, LI Xiu-ling. The Safety and Clinical Pregnancy Outcome of Preimplantation Genetic Testing in Frozen-Thawed Embryos [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2023, 42(2): 102-106. |
[15] | HUO Wen-jie, WANG Xiao-cong, PENG Fei, QUAN Song. Application of Deep Learning in Optimal Embryo Selection of In Vitro Fertilization [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2023, 42(2): 135-139. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||