国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志

国际生殖健康/计划生育 ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 221-224.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

成都流动人口避孕节育知识情况及其影响因素分析

李亦然，武俊青，李玉艳，赵瑞，周颖，纪红蕾，喻琳麟   

  1. 200237  上海市计划生育科学研究所，国家卫生计生委药具重点实验室（李亦然，武俊青，李玉艳，赵瑞，周颖，纪红蕾）；成都市计划生育指导所（喻琳麟）
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-02 修回日期:2018-03-07 出版日期:2018-05-15 发布日期:2018-05-15
  • 通讯作者: 武俊青，E-mail: wujq1688@163.com E-mail:wujq1688@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家“十二五”科技支撑计划（2012BAI32B08）

Analysis on Contraceptive Knowledge and Related Factors of Migrant Population in Chengdu

 LI Yi-ran, WU Jun-qing, LI Yu-yan, ZHAO Rui, ZHOU Ying, JI Hong-lei, YU Lin-lin   

  1. Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research, Key Laboratory of Family Planning Device of National Population and Family Planning Commission, Shanghai 200237, Chinａ （ＬI Yi-ran, WU Jun-qing, LI Yu-yan, ZHAO Rui, ZHOU Ying, JI Hong-leｉ）； Chengdu Institute of Family Planning, Chengdu 510100, China （ＹU Lin-liｎ）
  • Received:2018-01-02 Revised:2018-03-07 Published:2018-05-15 Online:2018-05-15
  • Contact: WU Jun-qing, E-maｉｌ： ｗujq1688@163.com E-mail:wujq1688@163.com

PDF (PC)

8611

摘要： 目的：了解成都市流动人口的避孕节育知识情况，探究影响流动人口避孕节育知识状况的因素。方法：采用多阶段随机整群抽样的方法，在四川省成都市武侯区和成华区流动人口集中的工厂、建筑工地和服务场所中随机选择2 124名流动人口作为研究对象进行调查分析。结果：婚姻状况、学历、性别、去年家庭人均月收入、户口性质、现居住地的主要居住方式、性生活频率以及是否采取避孕措施的研究对象避孕节育知识平均得分比较差异有统计学意义（均P＜0.05）；年龄、性别、学历、去年家庭人均月收入、户口性质、是否采取避孕措施与避孕节育知识得分有关：与20～29岁研究对象相比，40～49岁研究对象所获得的知识得分较低；与女性研究对象相比，男性研究对象所获得的知识得分较低；与本科及以上学历的研究对象相比，大专研究对象所获得的知识得分较高；与去年人均月收入≥7 000元的相比，收入＜1 000元的研究对象所获得的知识得分较低，收入5 000～6 999元的研究对象所获得的知识得分较高；与城镇户口的研究对象相比，农村户口的研究对象所获得的知识得分较高；与没有采取避孕措施的研究对象相比，采取避孕措施的研究对象所获得的知识得分较高（P＜0.05）。结论：中老年、男性、高学历、收入过高或过低、拥有城镇户口和未采取避孕措施的流动人口对自身避孕节育知识的关注程度明显不足，避孕节育知识的普及力度有待进一步增强。

关键词: 四川, 成都, 居住流动性, 避孕, 健康教育, 因素分析, 统计学

Abstract: Objective：To investigate the knowledge status of contraception in the migrant population, so as to explore the factors related to contraceptive knowledge in the migrant population. Methods: A stratified cluster sampling method was used in this study. In the factory, construction site and service site of Chengdu Wuhou District and Chenghua District, 2 124 were randomly selected as the research object of the migrant population. Results: There were significant differences in the average score of contraception knowledge related to the marital status, sex, education background, average monthly earnings, census register, mode of living, regularity of sexual activity, and whether to take contaceptives (all P＜0.05). The score of contraception knowledge was severally related to age, sex, education background, average monthly earnings, census register, and whether to take birth control. Compared with the objects aged 20 to 29 years, the objects aged 40 to 49 years gained low score of contraceptive knowledge. Compared with women, male objects gained low score. Compared with the objects with the bachelor or higher degree, those objects with junior education even gained higher score. Compared with the objects with monthly income≥7 000 yuan in last year, the objects with monthly income ＜1 000 yuan gained low score of contraceptive knowledge, while those objects with monthly income 5 000-6 999 yuan gained higher score. Interestingly, the rural objects gained higher score than the urban objects. It was understandable that those objects who took contraceptives gained higher scores than the objects who did not take contraceptives (all P＜0.05). Conclusions: Concern of the contraceptive knowledge in the migrant population of male, middle and elderly age, well-education, high-income or low-income, not take contraceptives and urban population is obviously inadequate, suggesting that the contraceptive knowledge should be further popularized.

Key words: Sichuan, Chengdu, Residential mobility, Contraception, Health education, Factor analysis, statistical