国际生殖健康/计划生育 ›› 2011, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 438-439.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

腹腔镜子宫动脉结扎术在宫颈或瘢痕切口妊娠治疗中的应用

吴晓兰, 刘 帅   

  1. 611130 成都市第五人民医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2011-11-15 发布日期:2011-11-15

Application of Laparoscopic Uterine Artery Ligation in the Treatment of Cervical or Cesarean Cicatrix Pregnancy

WU Xiao-lan, LIU Shuai   

  1. The Fifth of Chengdu People’s Hospital, Chengdu 611130, China
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2011-11-15 Online:2011-11-15

摘要: 目的:探讨腹腔镜子宫动脉结扎术在宫颈或瘢痕切口妊娠中的临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析64例宫颈或瘢痕切口妊娠患者,用甲氨蝶呤杀胚治疗后分为2组:腹腔镜辅助治疗组行清宫术前先行腹腔镜子宫动脉结扎术;常规治疗组直接行清宫术。分析2组术中出血量、临床疗效及全身不良反应。结果:先行子宫动脉结扎术再行清宫术与直接行清宫术比较,术中出血量少、临床疗效好;均未见明显的不良反应。结论:腹腔镜子宫动脉结扎术在宫颈或瘢痕切口妊娠治疗中应用安全有效。

关键词: 子宫, 动脉, 腹腔镜检查, 结扎术, 子宫颈, 妊娠, 异位, 治疗

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the curative effect of laparoscopic uterine artery ligation(LUAL) in the treatment of cervical or cesarean cicatrix pregnancy. Methods: Sixty-four cases of cervical or cesarean cicatrix pregnancy were retrospective analyzed. Cases were divided to two groups: one group was LUAL before curettage, another was simple curettage. The hemorrhage,curative effect and adverse reaction in two groups were compared. Results: The group of curettage with foregoing LUAL had less hemorrhage and better curative effect than control, without increasing the adverse reactions. Conclusions:LUAL is safe and effective in the treatment of cervical or cesarean cicatrix pregnancy.

Key words: Uterus, Arteries, Laparoscopy, Ligation, Cervix uteri, Pregnancy, ectopic, Therapy