Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 1-5.doi: 10.12280/gjszjk.20200513
• Original Article • Next Articles
NI Li-li, WANG Jing, DIAO Fei-yang, MA Xiang, MAO Yun-dong, LIU Jia-yin(), LIU Jin-yong(
)
Received:
2020-09-03
Published:
2021-01-15
Online:
2021-01-21
Contact:
LIU Jia-yin,LIU Jin-yong
E-mail:jyliu_nj@126.com;ljyfree1978@163.com
NI Li-li, WANG Jing, DIAO Fei-yang, MA Xiang, MAO Yun-dong, LIU Jia-yin, LIU Jin-yong. Relationship between Preovulatory Dominant Follicle Size and the Outcome of Artificial Insemination with Donor Sperm[J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2021, 40(1): 1-5.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
按助孕结局分组 | 周期数 | 女方年龄(周岁) | 女方BMI(kg/m2) | 周期序号 | 卵泡期天数(d) | 内膜厚度(mm) | 精子浓度(×106/mL) | PR总数(×106) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宫内妊娠组 | 588 | 27.67±3.21 | 21.68±2.73 | 1.53±0.85 | 15.22±3.14 | 10.52±1.93 | 50.09±14.81 | 16.72±6.09 |
未获宫内妊娠组 | 2 087 | 28.20±3.37 | 21.63±2.90 | 1.64±0.98 | 15.34±3.25 | 10.25±1.97 | 49.54±13.77 | 16.69±6.00 |
t | 3.406 | 0.352 | 2.731 | 0.742 | 2.883 | 0.848 | 0.097 | |
P | 0.001 | 0.725 | 0.006 | 0.458 | 0.004 | 0.397 | 0.923 | |
持续妊娠组 | 524 | 27.59±3.16 | 21.57±2.65 | 1.54±0.87 | 15.19±3.14 | 10.54±1.95 | 50.28±15.01 | 16.76±6.19 |
未获持续妊娠组 | 2 151 | 28.21±3.38 | 21.66±2.91 | 1.63±0.97 | 15.34±3.25 | 10.25±1.97 | 49.51±13.75 | 16.68±5.97 |
t | 3.987 | 0.698 | 2.138 | 0.956 | 2.962 | 1.122 | 0.287 | |
P | <0.001 | 0.485 | 0.033 | 0.339 | 0.003 | 0.262 | 0.774 |
按助孕结局分组 | 周期数 | 女方年龄(周岁) | 女方BMI(kg/m2) | 周期序号 | 卵泡期天数(d) | 内膜厚度(mm) | 精子浓度(×106/mL) | PR总数(×106) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宫内妊娠组 | 588 | 27.67±3.21 | 21.68±2.73 | 1.53±0.85 | 15.22±3.14 | 10.52±1.93 | 50.09±14.81 | 16.72±6.09 |
未获宫内妊娠组 | 2 087 | 28.20±3.37 | 21.63±2.90 | 1.64±0.98 | 15.34±3.25 | 10.25±1.97 | 49.54±13.77 | 16.69±6.00 |
t | 3.406 | 0.352 | 2.731 | 0.742 | 2.883 | 0.848 | 0.097 | |
P | 0.001 | 0.725 | 0.006 | 0.458 | 0.004 | 0.397 | 0.923 | |
持续妊娠组 | 524 | 27.59±3.16 | 21.57±2.65 | 1.54±0.87 | 15.19±3.14 | 10.54±1.95 | 50.28±15.01 | 16.76±6.19 |
未获持续妊娠组 | 2 151 | 28.21±3.38 | 21.66±2.91 | 1.63±0.97 | 15.34±3.25 | 10.25±1.97 | 49.51±13.75 | 16.68±5.97 |
t | 3.987 | 0.698 | 2.138 | 0.956 | 2.962 | 1.122 | 0.287 | |
P | <0.001 | 0.485 | 0.033 | 0.339 | 0.003 | 0.262 | 0.774 |
按助孕结局分组 | 周期数 | 女方年龄(周岁) | 女方BMI(kg/m2) | 周期序号 | 卵泡期天数(d) | 内膜厚度(mm) | 精子浓度(×106/mL) | PR总数(×106) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宫内妊娠组 | 138 | 27.67±3.22 | 21.87±2.73 | 2.04±1.02 | 14.27±2.26 | 9.91±2.12 | 51.38±14.33 | 16.41±4.89 |
未获宫内妊娠组 | 409 | 28.38±3.14 | 21.91±2.74 | 2.17±1.13 | 14.12±2.15 | 9.42±2.23 | 49.78±13.73 | 16.62±5.76 |
t | 2.279 | 0.145 | 1.203 | 0.679 | 2.268 | 1.165 | 0.386 | |
P | 0.023 | 0.885 | 0.230 | 0.497 | 0.024 | 0.245 | 0.700 | |
持续妊娠组 | 117 | 27.50±3.13 | 21.86±2.76 | 2.01±1.01 | 14.22±2.21 | 9.81±2.07 | 50.46±14.23 | 16.16±4.91 |
未获持续妊娠组 | 430 | 28.40±3.16 | 21.92±2.73 | 2.18±1.12 | 14.14±2.17 | 9.47±2.25 | 50.11±13.81 | 16.68±5.71 |
t | 2.740 | 0.207 | 1.556 | 0.353 | 1.461 | 0.241 | 0.903 | |
P | 0.006 | 0.836 | 0.121 | 0.724 | 0.145 | 0.809 | 0.367 |
按助孕结局分组 | 周期数 | 女方年龄(周岁) | 女方BMI(kg/m2) | 周期序号 | 卵泡期天数(d) | 内膜厚度(mm) | 精子浓度(×106/mL) | PR总数(×106) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宫内妊娠组 | 138 | 27.67±3.22 | 21.87±2.73 | 2.04±1.02 | 14.27±2.26 | 9.91±2.12 | 51.38±14.33 | 16.41±4.89 |
未获宫内妊娠组 | 409 | 28.38±3.14 | 21.91±2.74 | 2.17±1.13 | 14.12±2.15 | 9.42±2.23 | 49.78±13.73 | 16.62±5.76 |
t | 2.279 | 0.145 | 1.203 | 0.679 | 2.268 | 1.165 | 0.386 | |
P | 0.023 | 0.885 | 0.230 | 0.497 | 0.024 | 0.245 | 0.700 | |
持续妊娠组 | 117 | 27.50±3.13 | 21.86±2.76 | 2.01±1.01 | 14.22±2.21 | 9.81±2.07 | 50.46±14.23 | 16.16±4.91 |
未获持续妊娠组 | 430 | 28.40±3.16 | 21.92±2.73 | 2.18±1.12 | 14.14±2.17 | 9.47±2.25 | 50.11±13.81 | 16.68±5.71 |
t | 2.740 | 0.207 | 1.556 | 0.353 | 1.461 | 0.241 | 0.903 | |
P | 0.006 | 0.836 | 0.121 | 0.724 | 0.145 | 0.809 | 0.367 |
按助孕结局分组 | 周期数 | 女方年龄(岁) | 女方BMI(kg/m2) | 周期序号 | 卵泡期天数(d) | 内膜厚度(mm) | 精子浓度(×106/mL) | PR总数(×106) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宫内妊娠组 | 344 | 27.72±3.28 | 21.78±2.82 | 2.23±0.98 | 13.71±2.17 | 9.39±1.99 | 48.20±11.20 | 15.99±4.41 |
未获宫内妊娠组 | 1222 | 28.30±3.55 | 22.10±3.10 | 2.54±1.14 | 13.58±1.95 | 9.39±1.88 | 48.07±11.64 | 15.48±4.57 |
t | 2.814 | 1.745 | 4.945 | 1.099 | 0.026 | 0.196 | 1.827 | |
P | 0.005 | 0.081 | <0.001 | 0.272 | 0.979 | 0.845 | 0.068 | |
持续妊娠组 | 318 | 27.72±3.23 | 21.79±2.81 | 2.24±1.00 | 13.70±2.19 | 9.33±1.97 | 48.15±11.22 | 15.95±4.37 |
未获持续妊娠组 | 1248 | 28.30±3.55 | 22.09±3.10 | 2.53±1.13 | 13.58±1.96 | 9.40±1.89 | 48.08±11.62 | 15.50±4.57 |
t | 2.822 | 1.564 | 4.553 | 0.873 | 0.567 | 0.090 | 1.572 | |
P | 0.005 | 0.118 | <0.001 | 0.383 | 0.571 | 0.928 | 0.116 |
按助孕结局分组 | 周期数 | 女方年龄(岁) | 女方BMI(kg/m2) | 周期序号 | 卵泡期天数(d) | 内膜厚度(mm) | 精子浓度(×106/mL) | PR总数(×106) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宫内妊娠组 | 344 | 27.72±3.28 | 21.78±2.82 | 2.23±0.98 | 13.71±2.17 | 9.39±1.99 | 48.20±11.20 | 15.99±4.41 |
未获宫内妊娠组 | 1222 | 28.30±3.55 | 22.10±3.10 | 2.54±1.14 | 13.58±1.95 | 9.39±1.88 | 48.07±11.64 | 15.48±4.57 |
t | 2.814 | 1.745 | 4.945 | 1.099 | 0.026 | 0.196 | 1.827 | |
P | 0.005 | 0.081 | <0.001 | 0.272 | 0.979 | 0.845 | 0.068 | |
持续妊娠组 | 318 | 27.72±3.23 | 21.79±2.81 | 2.24±1.00 | 13.70±2.19 | 9.33±1.97 | 48.15±11.22 | 15.95±4.37 |
未获持续妊娠组 | 1248 | 28.30±3.55 | 22.09±3.10 | 2.53±1.13 | 13.58±1.96 | 9.40±1.89 | 48.08±11.62 | 15.50±4.57 |
t | 2.822 | 1.564 | 4.553 | 0.873 | 0.567 | 0.090 | 1.572 | |
P | 0.005 | 0.118 | <0.001 | 0.383 | 0.571 | 0.928 | 0.116 |
助孕结局 | 优势组 | 对照组 | OR | 95%CI | P | aOR | 95%CI | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
自然周期 | 16.0≤φ(mm)≤19.9 | φ(mm)≥20.0 | ||||||
宫内妊娠率[%(n/n)] | 23.01(452/1 964) | 19.13(136/711) | 1.264 | 1.020~1.566 | 0.032 | 1.260 | 1.016~1.564 | 0.035 |
持续妊娠率[%(n/n)] | 20.57(404/1 964) | 16.88(120/711) | 1.275 | 1.019~1.597 | 0.034 | 1.277 | 1.018~1.600 | 0.034 |
CC诱导排卵周期 | 18.0≤φ(mm)≤21.9 | φ(mm)<18.0或≥22.0 | ||||||
宫内妊娠率[%(n/n)] | 26.86(123/458) | 16.85(15/89) | 1.811 | 1.002~3.275 | 0.049 | 1.898 | 1.041~3.459 | 0.036 |
持续妊娠率[%(n/n)] | 22.27(102/458) | 16.85(15/89) | 1.413 | 0.778~2.568 | 0.256 | 1.490 | 0.814~2.728 | 0.196 |
LE诱导排卵周期 | 18.0≤φ(mm)≤20.0 | φ(mm)<18.0或>20.0 | ||||||
宫内妊娠率[%(n/n)] | 23.90(250/1 046) | 18.08(94/520) | 1.423 | 1.092~1.855 | 0.009 | 1.405 | 1.075~1.835 | 0.013 |
持续妊娠率[%(n/n)] | 22.28(233/1 046) | 16.35(85/520) | 1.467 | 1.115~1.930 | 0.006 | 1.449 | 1.099~1.910 | 0.009 |
助孕结局 | 优势组 | 对照组 | OR | 95%CI | P | aOR | 95%CI | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
自然周期 | 16.0≤φ(mm)≤19.9 | φ(mm)≥20.0 | ||||||
宫内妊娠率[%(n/n)] | 23.01(452/1 964) | 19.13(136/711) | 1.264 | 1.020~1.566 | 0.032 | 1.260 | 1.016~1.564 | 0.035 |
持续妊娠率[%(n/n)] | 20.57(404/1 964) | 16.88(120/711) | 1.275 | 1.019~1.597 | 0.034 | 1.277 | 1.018~1.600 | 0.034 |
CC诱导排卵周期 | 18.0≤φ(mm)≤21.9 | φ(mm)<18.0或≥22.0 | ||||||
宫内妊娠率[%(n/n)] | 26.86(123/458) | 16.85(15/89) | 1.811 | 1.002~3.275 | 0.049 | 1.898 | 1.041~3.459 | 0.036 |
持续妊娠率[%(n/n)] | 22.27(102/458) | 16.85(15/89) | 1.413 | 0.778~2.568 | 0.256 | 1.490 | 0.814~2.728 | 0.196 |
LE诱导排卵周期 | 18.0≤φ(mm)≤20.0 | φ(mm)<18.0或>20.0 | ||||||
宫内妊娠率[%(n/n)] | 23.90(250/1 046) | 18.08(94/520) | 1.423 | 1.092~1.855 | 0.009 | 1.405 | 1.075~1.835 | 0.013 |
持续妊娠率[%(n/n)] | 22.28(233/1 046) | 16.35(85/520) | 1.467 | 1.115~1.930 | 0.006 | 1.449 | 1.099~1.910 | 0.009 |
按排卵 方式分组 | 周期数 | 卵泡直径 (mm) | 获得宫内妊娠的 周期数(宫内 妊娠率)[个(%)] | 获得持续妊娠的 周期数(持续 妊娠率)[个(%)] |
---|---|---|---|---|
自然周期 | 2 675 | |||
自发排卵组 | 640 | 17.63±0.87 | 139(21.72) | 120(18.75) |
hCG扳机组 | 2 035 | 19.52±1.07 | 449(22.06) | 404(19.85) |
χ2或 t | -45.192 | 0.034 | 0.376 | |
P | <0.001 | 0.854 | 0.540 | |
CC诱导排卵周期 | 547 | |||
自发排卵组 | 82 | 18.03±1.10 | 22(26.83) | 21(25.61) |
hCG扳机组 | 465 | 20.06±1.26 | 116(24.95) | 96(20.65) |
χ2或 t | -13.636 | 0.131 | 1.022 | |
P | <0.001 | 0.717 | 0.312 | |
LE诱导排卵周期 | 1 566 | |||
自发排卵组 | 150 | 17.88±1.26 | 28(18.67) | 23(15.33) |
hCG扳机组 | 1 416 | 19.86±1.23 | 316(22.32) | 295(20.83) |
χ2或 t | -18.768 | 1.054 | 2.535 | |
P | <0.001 | 0.305 | 0.111 |
按排卵 方式分组 | 周期数 | 卵泡直径 (mm) | 获得宫内妊娠的 周期数(宫内 妊娠率)[个(%)] | 获得持续妊娠的 周期数(持续 妊娠率)[个(%)] |
---|---|---|---|---|
自然周期 | 2 675 | |||
自发排卵组 | 640 | 17.63±0.87 | 139(21.72) | 120(18.75) |
hCG扳机组 | 2 035 | 19.52±1.07 | 449(22.06) | 404(19.85) |
χ2或 t | -45.192 | 0.034 | 0.376 | |
P | <0.001 | 0.854 | 0.540 | |
CC诱导排卵周期 | 547 | |||
自发排卵组 | 82 | 18.03±1.10 | 22(26.83) | 21(25.61) |
hCG扳机组 | 465 | 20.06±1.26 | 116(24.95) | 96(20.65) |
χ2或 t | -13.636 | 0.131 | 1.022 | |
P | <0.001 | 0.717 | 0.312 | |
LE诱导排卵周期 | 1 566 | |||
自发排卵组 | 150 | 17.88±1.26 | 28(18.67) | 23(15.33) |
hCG扳机组 | 1 416 | 19.86±1.23 | 316(22.32) | 295(20.83) |
χ2或 t | -18.768 | 1.054 | 2.535 | |
P | <0.001 | 0.305 | 0.111 |
[1] | Maher MA, Abdelaziz A, Shehata YA. Effect of follicular diameter at the time of ovulation triggering on pregnancy outcomes during intrauterine insemination[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2017,139(2):174-179. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12291. |
[2] | 张丽珠. 临床生殖内分泌与不育症[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008: 270-291. |
[3] | Su HW, Yi YC, Wei TY, et al. Detection of ovulation, a review of currently available methods[J]. Bioeng Transl Med, 2017,2(3):238-246. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10058. |
[4] | Veltman-Verhulst SM, Hughes E, Ayeleke RO, et al. Intra-uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2016,2:CD001838. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001838.pub5. |
[5] | 张清健, 宋革, 钟小英, 等. 供精人工授精10690个周期妊娠结局的多因素分析[J]. 中华生殖与避孕杂志, 2017,37(2):101-105. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2096-2916.2017.02.002. |
[6] | 倪丽莉, 侯振, 王菁, 等. 自然周期卵泡和子宫内膜发育及供精人工授精结局的影响因素[J]. 生殖医学杂志, 2019,28(12):1402-1409. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3845.2019.12.003. |
[7] | 倪丽莉, 王菁, 刁飞扬, 等. 供精人工授精后早期妊娠丢失的影响因素分析[J]. 生殖医学杂志, 2020,29(7):900-906. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3845.2020.07.011. |
[8] | Cohlen B, Bijkerk A, Van der Poel S, et al. IUI: review and systematic assessment of the evidence that supports global recommendations[J]. Hum Reprod Update, 2018,24(3):300-319. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmx041. |
[9] | 倪丽莉, 王菁, 张燕, 等. 供精人工授精临床结局影响因素分析[J]. 国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志, 2019,38(5):357-361.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1889.2019.050001. |
[10] | DiMattina M, Gordon JD, Botes A, et al. Follicular and estradiol parameters that improve success with natural cycle in vitro fertilization[J]. J Reprod Med, 2014,59(5/6):267-273. |
[11] | Farhi J, Orvieto R, Gavish O, et al. The association between follicular size on human chorionic gonadotropin day and pregnancy rate in clomiphene citrate treated polycystic ovary syndrome patients[J]. Gynecol Endocrinol, 2010,26(7):546-548. doi: 10.3109/09513591003686312. |
[12] | Haritha S, Rajagopalan G. Follicular growth, endometrial thickness, and serum estradiol levels in spontaneous and clomiphene citrate-induced cycles[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2003,81(3):287-292. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(02)00404-6. |
[13] | Debnath J, Satija L, Rastogi V, et al. Transvaginal sonographic study of follicular dynamics in spontaneous and clomiphene citrate cycles[J]. Med J Armed Forces India, 2000,56(3):184-187. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(17)30161-2. |
[14] | Mehdinejadiani S, Amidi F, Mehdizadeh M, et al. Effects of letrozole and clomiphene citrate on Wnt signaling pathway in endometrium of polycystic ovarian syndrome and healthy women†[J]. Biol Reprod, 2019,100(3):641-648. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioy187. |
[15] | Chaube SK, Prasad PV, Thakur SC, et al. Estradiol protects clomiphene citrate-induced apoptosis in ovarian follicular cells and ovulated cumulus-oocyte complexes[J]. Fertil Steril, 2005,84(Suppl 2):1163-1172. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.03.073. |
[16] | Sundström P, Nilsson BO. Meiotic and cytoplasmic maturation of oocytes collected in stimulated cycles is asynchronous[J]. Hum Reprod, 1988,3(5):613-619. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136756. |
[17] | Zarei A, Alborzi S, Askary E, et al. Effects of clomiphene citrate for prevention of premature luteinizing hormone surge in those undergoing intrauterine insemination outcome: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial[J]. J Adv Pharm Technol Res, 2018,9(3):87-93. doi: 10.4103/japtr.JAPTR_293_18. |
[18] | Palatnik A, Strawn E, Szabo A, et al. What is the optimal follicular size before triggering ovulation in intrauterine insemination cycles with clomiphene citrate or letrozole? An analysis of 988 cycles[J]. Fertil Steril, 2012, 97(5): 1089-1094.e1-e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.02.018. |
[1] | WANG Jia-yi, JI Hui, LI Xin, LING Xiu-feng. Effect of Serum β-hCG Level on the Next Day of Dual Trigger in Antagonist Regimen on the Outcome of Fresh Embryo Transfer [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(6): 447-452. |
[2] | LUO Sha-sha, WANG De-jing. Analysis of Influencing Factors of Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer Pregnancy Outcome [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(5): 420-424. |
[3] | LI Miao-miao, JIANG Hong, CAI Peng-da. Influence Factor Analysis and Forecasting Research of Embryonic Arrest [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(4): 332-337. |
[4] | WANG Dong-xue, BAO Li-li, LIU Shan, YANG Bo. Effect of Modified Flexible Antagonist Protocol on the Outcome of COH in Patients with Normal Ovarian Function [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(3): 185-189. |
[5] | HAO Jia-li, HE Yu-jie. Evaluation of Fertility Quality of Life in Infertile Population and Analysis of Influencing Factors [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(2): 159-165. |
[6] | LI Cai-hua, GUO Pei-pei, JIANG Xiao-hua, FANG You-yan, ZHOU Ping, WEI Zhao-lian. Application Progress of Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(1): 68-73. |
[7] | CHEN Yin, WANG Jing, MAO Yun-dong. Research Progress of the Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Protocols for Women with Endometriosis-Related Infertility [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2023, 42(5): 398-402. |
[8] | XIONG Shu-yun, SUN Ke-feng, LI Yu-ke, XU Ying-hong, LIU Ming-hao. Research Progress of Stem Cell Therapy for Thin Endometrium [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2023, 42(4): 334-338. |
[9] | ZHANG Yuan, JIANG Chao, JIANG Chun-yan, QIAN Yi, YUAN Chun, SHU Li, MAO Yun-dong, LIU Jia-yin, DIAO Fei-yang, MA Xiang. Effect of Atosiban on the Outcomes of Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer in Patients with Repeated Implantation Failure [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2023, 42(2): 95-101. |
[10] | ZHAO Hai-jun, ZHANG Xi-hui, CHEN Jing, LU Jing, ZHANG Hong-feng, CHANG Wen-liang. Comparison of Three Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation Protocols in Advanced-Age Infertile Patients with Diminished Ovarian Reserve [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2023, 42(1): 13-17. |
[11] | WANG Ying-xin, ZHANG Ning, XU Shu-ning. Occult LH Peak in GnRH Antagonist Protocol: A Case Report and Literature Review [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2023, 42(1): 27-30. |
[12] | SHENG Jia-jia, DAI Zhi-jun, TANG Zhi-xia, YAN Chun, HONG Ming-yun. Analysis of Affecting Factors on Clinical Pregnancy Outcomes in GnRH Antagonist Protocol [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2023, 42(1): 7-12. |
[13] | ZHOU Yu-xi, ZHANG Juan, ZHANG Juan-juan, LING Xiu-feng, ZHAO Chun. Effect of the Descend Range of Estradiol after Oocyte Retrieval in Antagonist Regimen on the Outcome of In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2022, 41(4): 265-269. |
[14] | ZHOU Duo, LI Heng-jing, LU Guang-mei, HUANG Qiu-fang, ZHANG Yi. A Case of Spontaneous Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome in Pregnancy [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2022, 41(4): 298-301. |
[15] | JIANG Wei, NI Dan-yu, LI Xin, LU Ying. Comparison of Outcomes of Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer after GnRH-Agonist Long Protocol and GnRH-Antagonist Protocol [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2022, 41(2): 101-105. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||