Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 6-11.doi: 10.12280/gjszjk.20210361
• Original Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHU Yuan, YI Shan-ling, ZHOU Jian-jun()
Received:
2021-08-10
Published:
2022-01-15
Online:
2022-02-17
Contact:
ZHOU Jian-jun
E-mail:zhou6jj@hotmail.com
ZHU Yuan, YI Shan-ling, ZHOU Jian-jun. Predictors Analysis of Obtaining MⅡ Oocytes or Transferable Embryos in Mild Ovarian Stimulation with Clomiphene Citrate[J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2022, 41(1): 6-11.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
组别 | n | 年龄(岁) | 基础FSH(U/L) | 基础LH(U/L) | 基础E2(pmol/L) | 基础PRL(nmol/L) | 基础睾酮(nmol/L) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
获成熟卵母细胞组 | 916 | 38.00(32.00,42.00) | 9.65(7.57,13.43) | 3.84(2.69,5.29) | 145.96(93.14,239.50) | 0.51(0.38,0.74) | 1.04(0.69,1.53) | |||||
未获成熟卵母细胞组 | 113 | 39.00(33.00,43.00) | 11.56(8.19,14.95) | 3.86(2.88,5.29) | 153.37(91.86,269.38) | 0.51(0.38,0.67) | 1.01(0.66,1.67) | |||||
χ2 | 3.413 | 8.582 | 0.548 | 0.038 | 0.086 | 0.051 | ||||||
P | 0.065 | 0.003 | 0.459 | 0.846 | 0.770 | 0.822 | ||||||
组别 | n | 基础AFC (个) | 使用HMG者 | 促排卵时间 (d) | hCG日最大优势 卵泡直径(mm) | hCG日优势 卵泡数(个) | hCG日优势卵泡 E2水平(pmol/L) | |||||
获成熟卵母细胞组 | 916 | 5.00(4.00,7.00) | 801(87.45) | 11.00(9.00,13.00) | 19.50(18.50,20.50) | 2.00(1.00,3.00) | 1 920.75(1 520.45,2 433.93) | |||||
未获成熟卵母细胞组 | 113 | 5.00(3.00,7.00) | 93(82.46) | 12.00(9.00,14.00) | 18.50(18.00,19.50) | 1.00(1.00,2.00) | 1 744.70(1 436.71,2 281.11) | |||||
χ2 | 3.418 | 2.336 | 1.338 | 39.708 | 65.824 | 5.435 | ||||||
P | 0.064 | 0.126 | 0.247 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.020 |
组别 | n | 年龄(岁) | 基础FSH(U/L) | 基础LH(U/L) | 基础E2(pmol/L) | 基础PRL(nmol/L) | 基础睾酮(nmol/L) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
获成熟卵母细胞组 | 916 | 38.00(32.00,42.00) | 9.65(7.57,13.43) | 3.84(2.69,5.29) | 145.96(93.14,239.50) | 0.51(0.38,0.74) | 1.04(0.69,1.53) | |||||
未获成熟卵母细胞组 | 113 | 39.00(33.00,43.00) | 11.56(8.19,14.95) | 3.86(2.88,5.29) | 153.37(91.86,269.38) | 0.51(0.38,0.67) | 1.01(0.66,1.67) | |||||
χ2 | 3.413 | 8.582 | 0.548 | 0.038 | 0.086 | 0.051 | ||||||
P | 0.065 | 0.003 | 0.459 | 0.846 | 0.770 | 0.822 | ||||||
组别 | n | 基础AFC (个) | 使用HMG者 | 促排卵时间 (d) | hCG日最大优势 卵泡直径(mm) | hCG日优势 卵泡数(个) | hCG日优势卵泡 E2水平(pmol/L) | |||||
获成熟卵母细胞组 | 916 | 5.00(4.00,7.00) | 801(87.45) | 11.00(9.00,13.00) | 19.50(18.50,20.50) | 2.00(1.00,3.00) | 1 920.75(1 520.45,2 433.93) | |||||
未获成熟卵母细胞组 | 113 | 5.00(3.00,7.00) | 93(82.46) | 12.00(9.00,14.00) | 18.50(18.00,19.50) | 1.00(1.00,2.00) | 1 744.70(1 436.71,2 281.11) | |||||
χ2 | 3.418 | 2.336 | 1.338 | 39.708 | 65.824 | 5.435 | ||||||
P | 0.064 | 0.126 | 0.247 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.020 |
变量 | B | SE | Wald χ2 | OR | 95%CI | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
hCG日最大优势卵泡直径(mm) | 0.208 | 0.092 | 5.130 | 1.231 | 1.028~1.474 | 0.024 |
hCG日优势卵泡数(个) | 0.893 | 0.168 | 28.241 | 2.443 | 1.757~3.397 | <0.001 |
hCG日优势卵泡E2水平(pmol/L) | <0.001 | <0.001 | 8.658 | 1.000 | 1.000~1.001 | 0.003 |
变量 | B | SE | Wald χ2 | OR | 95%CI | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
hCG日最大优势卵泡直径(mm) | 0.208 | 0.092 | 5.130 | 1.231 | 1.028~1.474 | 0.024 |
hCG日优势卵泡数(个) | 0.893 | 0.168 | 28.241 | 2.443 | 1.757~3.397 | <0.001 |
hCG日优势卵泡E2水平(pmol/L) | <0.001 | <0.001 | 8.658 | 1.000 | 1.000~1.001 | 0.003 |
组别 | n | 年龄(岁) | 配偶年龄(岁) | 基础FSH(U/L) | 基础LH(U/L) | 基础E2(pmol/L) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
获可移植胚胎组 | 622 | 38.00(33.00,41.25) | 38.00(33.00,43.00) | 9.54(7.55,13.10) | 3.63(2.69,5.23) | 146.32(93.25,242.22) | ||||||
未获可移植胚胎组 | 407 | 38.00(32.00,42.00) | 38.00(33.00,43.00) | 10.37(7.81,14.86) | 3.94(2.85,5.51) | 146.62(92.04,235.23) | ||||||
χ2 | 0.654 | 1.382 | 6.510 | 5.369 | 0.393 | |||||||
P | 0.419 | 0.240 | 0.011 | 0.020 | 0.531 | |||||||
组别 | n | 基础PRL(nmol/L) | 基础睾酮(nmol/L) | 基础AFC(个) | 使用HMG者 | 促排卵时间(d) | ||||||
获可移植胚胎组 | 622 | 0.51(0.37,0.74) | 1.08(0.73,1.53) | 5.00(4.00,7.00) | 553(88.91) | 11.00(9.00,13.00) | ||||||
未获可移植胚胎组 | 407 | 0.53(0.38,0.72) | 0.99(0.66,1.49) | 5.00(4.00,7.00) | 341(83.82) | 11.00(9.00,13.00) | ||||||
χ2 | 0.005 | 1.995 | 0.253 | 5.665 | 0.944 | |||||||
P | 0.946 | 0.158 | 0.615 | 0.017 | 0.331 | |||||||
组别 | n | hCG日最大优势卵泡直径(mm) | hCG日优势卵泡数(个) | hCG日优势卵泡E2水平(pmol/L) | ||||||||
获可移植胚胎组 | 622 | 19.50(18.50,20.50) | 2.00(1.00,3.00) | 1 923.03(1 538.93,2 415.77) | ||||||||
未获可移植胚胎组 | 407 | 19.00(18.00,20.00) | 1.00(1.00,2.00) | 1 841.77(1 461.58,2 442.44) | ||||||||
χ2 | 27.805 | 81.906 | 1.289 | |||||||||
P | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.256 |
组别 | n | 年龄(岁) | 配偶年龄(岁) | 基础FSH(U/L) | 基础LH(U/L) | 基础E2(pmol/L) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
获可移植胚胎组 | 622 | 38.00(33.00,41.25) | 38.00(33.00,43.00) | 9.54(7.55,13.10) | 3.63(2.69,5.23) | 146.32(93.25,242.22) | ||||||
未获可移植胚胎组 | 407 | 38.00(32.00,42.00) | 38.00(33.00,43.00) | 10.37(7.81,14.86) | 3.94(2.85,5.51) | 146.62(92.04,235.23) | ||||||
χ2 | 0.654 | 1.382 | 6.510 | 5.369 | 0.393 | |||||||
P | 0.419 | 0.240 | 0.011 | 0.020 | 0.531 | |||||||
组别 | n | 基础PRL(nmol/L) | 基础睾酮(nmol/L) | 基础AFC(个) | 使用HMG者 | 促排卵时间(d) | ||||||
获可移植胚胎组 | 622 | 0.51(0.37,0.74) | 1.08(0.73,1.53) | 5.00(4.00,7.00) | 553(88.91) | 11.00(9.00,13.00) | ||||||
未获可移植胚胎组 | 407 | 0.53(0.38,0.72) | 0.99(0.66,1.49) | 5.00(4.00,7.00) | 341(83.82) | 11.00(9.00,13.00) | ||||||
χ2 | 0.005 | 1.995 | 0.253 | 5.665 | 0.944 | |||||||
P | 0.946 | 0.158 | 0.615 | 0.017 | 0.331 | |||||||
组别 | n | hCG日最大优势卵泡直径(mm) | hCG日优势卵泡数(个) | hCG日优势卵泡E2水平(pmol/L) | ||||||||
获可移植胚胎组 | 622 | 19.50(18.50,20.50) | 2.00(1.00,3.00) | 1 923.03(1 538.93,2 415.77) | ||||||||
未获可移植胚胎组 | 407 | 19.00(18.00,20.00) | 1.00(1.00,2.00) | 1 841.77(1 461.58,2 442.44) | ||||||||
χ2 | 27.805 | 81.906 | 1.289 | |||||||||
P | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.256 |
组别 | n | 年龄(岁) | 配偶年龄(岁) | 基础FSH(U/L) | 基础LH(U/L) | 基础E2(pmol/L) | 基础PRL(nmol/L) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
获可移植胚胎组 | 168 | 39.00(32.00,41.00) | 37.92±7.07 | 10.35(7.67,14.94) | 3.68(2.76,5.30) | 147.30(93.64,255.76) | 0.47(0.34,0.70) | |||||
未获可移植胚胎组 | 214 | 39.00(34.00,42.00) | 39.11±5.98 | 10.58(8.08,15.42) | 4.10(2.96,5.77) | 145.30(89.47,243.91) | 0.52(0.37,0.72) | |||||
t或χ2 | 2.027 | 1.780 | 0.954 | 2.190 | 0.515 | 1.091 | ||||||
P | 0.155 | 0.076 | 0.329 | 0.139 | 0.473 | 0.296 | ||||||
组别 | n | 基础睾酮(nmol/L) | 基础AFC(个) | 使用HMG者 | 促排卵时间(d) | hCG日优势卵泡直径(mm) | hCG日E2水平(pmol/L) | |||||
获可移植胚胎组 | 168 | 1.08(0.66,1.67) | 5.00(3.00,6.00) | 129(76.79) | 10.00(8.00,12.00) | 19.00(18.50,19.50) | 2 367.39(1 886.31,3 096.57) | |||||
未获可移植胚胎组 | 214 | 0.94(0.66,1.35) | 5.00(3.00,7.00) | 167(78.04) | 10.50(8.00,13.00) | 18.85(18.00,20.00) | 2 055.48(1 601.13,2 781.87) | |||||
t或χ2 | 2.643 | 0.000 | 0.085 | 2.330 | 4.031 | 12.301 | ||||||
P | 0.104 | 0.996 | 0.771 | 0.127 | 0.045 | <0.001 |
组别 | n | 年龄(岁) | 配偶年龄(岁) | 基础FSH(U/L) | 基础LH(U/L) | 基础E2(pmol/L) | 基础PRL(nmol/L) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
获可移植胚胎组 | 168 | 39.00(32.00,41.00) | 37.92±7.07 | 10.35(7.67,14.94) | 3.68(2.76,5.30) | 147.30(93.64,255.76) | 0.47(0.34,0.70) | |||||
未获可移植胚胎组 | 214 | 39.00(34.00,42.00) | 39.11±5.98 | 10.58(8.08,15.42) | 4.10(2.96,5.77) | 145.30(89.47,243.91) | 0.52(0.37,0.72) | |||||
t或χ2 | 2.027 | 1.780 | 0.954 | 2.190 | 0.515 | 1.091 | ||||||
P | 0.155 | 0.076 | 0.329 | 0.139 | 0.473 | 0.296 | ||||||
组别 | n | 基础睾酮(nmol/L) | 基础AFC(个) | 使用HMG者 | 促排卵时间(d) | hCG日优势卵泡直径(mm) | hCG日E2水平(pmol/L) | |||||
获可移植胚胎组 | 168 | 1.08(0.66,1.67) | 5.00(3.00,6.00) | 129(76.79) | 10.00(8.00,12.00) | 19.00(18.50,19.50) | 2 367.39(1 886.31,3 096.57) | |||||
未获可移植胚胎组 | 214 | 0.94(0.66,1.35) | 5.00(3.00,7.00) | 167(78.04) | 10.50(8.00,13.00) | 18.85(18.00,20.00) | 2 055.48(1 601.13,2 781.87) | |||||
t或χ2 | 2.643 | 0.000 | 0.085 | 2.330 | 4.031 | 12.301 | ||||||
P | 0.104 | 0.996 | 0.771 | 0.127 | 0.045 | <0.001 |
组别 | n | 年龄(岁) | 配偶年龄(岁) | 基础FSH(U/L) | 基础LH(U/L) | 基础E2(pmol/L) | 基础PRL(nmol/L) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
高于最佳临界值组 | 240 | 38.00(33.00,42.00) | 38.46±6.76 | 10.57(7.91,15.92) | 3.82(2.78,5.47) | 150.76(91.99,243.33) | 0.52(0.37,0.70) | |||||
低于最佳临界值组 | 142 | 40.00(34.00,42.00) | 38.81±6.06 | 10.45(7.57,14.68) | 4.27(3.11,5.98) | 135.48(91.56,269.93) | 0.46(0.34,0.73) | |||||
t或χ2 | 3.004 | 0.510 | 0.528 | 2.010 | 0.236 | 2.666 | ||||||
P | 0.083 | 0.610 | 0.467 | 0.156 | 0.627 | 0.102 | ||||||
组别 | n | 基础睾酮(nmol/L) | 基础AFC(个) | 使用HMG者 | 促排卵时间(d) | hCG日优势卵泡直径(mm) | 可移植胚胎 | |||||
高于最佳临界值组 | 240 | 1.01(0.69,1.56) | 5.00(3.00,7.00) | 187(77.92) | 10.00(8.00,12.00) | 19.00(18.50,20.00) | 125(52.08) | |||||
低于最佳临界值组 | 142 | 0.94(0.62,1.35) | 5.00(3.00,6.00) | 109(76.76) | 10.00(8.00,14.00) | 18.25(18.00,19.00) | 43(30.28) | |||||
t或χ2 | 2.113 | 1.344 | 0.068 | 1.759 | 36.418 | 17.211 | ||||||
P | 0.146 | 0.246 | 0.794 | 0.185 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
组别 | n | 年龄(岁) | 配偶年龄(岁) | 基础FSH(U/L) | 基础LH(U/L) | 基础E2(pmol/L) | 基础PRL(nmol/L) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
高于最佳临界值组 | 240 | 38.00(33.00,42.00) | 38.46±6.76 | 10.57(7.91,15.92) | 3.82(2.78,5.47) | 150.76(91.99,243.33) | 0.52(0.37,0.70) | |||||
低于最佳临界值组 | 142 | 40.00(34.00,42.00) | 38.81±6.06 | 10.45(7.57,14.68) | 4.27(3.11,5.98) | 135.48(91.56,269.93) | 0.46(0.34,0.73) | |||||
t或χ2 | 3.004 | 0.510 | 0.528 | 2.010 | 0.236 | 2.666 | ||||||
P | 0.083 | 0.610 | 0.467 | 0.156 | 0.627 | 0.102 | ||||||
组别 | n | 基础睾酮(nmol/L) | 基础AFC(个) | 使用HMG者 | 促排卵时间(d) | hCG日优势卵泡直径(mm) | 可移植胚胎 | |||||
高于最佳临界值组 | 240 | 1.01(0.69,1.56) | 5.00(3.00,7.00) | 187(77.92) | 10.00(8.00,12.00) | 19.00(18.50,20.00) | 125(52.08) | |||||
低于最佳临界值组 | 142 | 0.94(0.62,1.35) | 5.00(3.00,6.00) | 109(76.76) | 10.00(8.00,14.00) | 18.25(18.00,19.00) | 43(30.28) | |||||
t或χ2 | 2.113 | 1.344 | 0.068 | 1.759 | 36.418 | 17.211 | ||||||
P | 0.146 | 0.246 | 0.794 | 0.185 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
[1] |
杨弘睚, 马媛, 石永乾, 等. 不同控制性卵巢刺激方案对早发性卵巢功能不全患者获卵数和可用胚胎数的影响[J]. 生殖医学杂志, 2020, 29(10):1280-1286. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3845.2020.10.005.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3845.2020.10.005 |
[2] |
周莉娜, 陈威, 吴煜, 等. 拮抗剂方案与微刺激方案对卵巢低反应患者体外受精-胚胎移植结局的比较[J]. 国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志, 2019, 38(5):374-377,388. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1889.2019.05.005.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1889.2019.05.005 |
[3] |
Ochin H, Ma X, Wang L, et al. Low dose clomiphene citrate as a mild stimulation protocol in women with unsuspected poor in vitro fertilization result can generate more oocytes with optimal cumulative pregnancy rate[J]. J Ovarian Res, 2018, 11(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13048-018-0408-x.
doi: 10.1186/s13048-018-0408-x URL |
[4] |
莫莉菁, 付伟平, 朱琴, 等. 微刺激促排卵在卵巢低反应不孕患者中的应用[J]. 生殖医学杂志, 2019, 28(6):649-654. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3845.2019.06.012.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3845.2019.06.012 |
[5] |
倪丽莉, 王菁, 刁飞扬, 等. 卵泡发育不良女性氯米芬与来曲唑诱导排卵的助孕结局比较[J]. 国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志, 2021, 40(4):277-281. doi: 10.12280/gjszjk.20210002.
doi: 10.12280/gjszjk.20210002 |
[6] |
Mehdinejadiani S, Amidi F, Mehdizadeh M, et al. Effects of letrozole and clomiphene citrate on Wnt signaling pathway in endometrium of polycystic ovarian syndrome and healthy women[J]. Biol Reprod, 2019, 100(3):641-648. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioy187.
doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioy187 pmid: 30184105 |
[7] |
Du DF, Li MF, Li XL. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a clinical retrospective study on 565 inpatients[J]. Gynecol Endocrinol, 2020, 36(4):313-317. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2019.1653275.
doi: 10.1080/09513590.2019.1653275 URL |
[8] |
Abe T, Yabuuchi A, Ezoe K, et al. Success rates in minimal stimulation cycle IVF with clomiphene citrate only[J]. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2020, 37(2):297-304. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01662-z.
doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01662-z URL |
[9] |
Ovarian Stimulation TEGGO, Bosch E, Broer S, et al. ESHRE guideline: ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI[J]. Hum Reprod Open, 2020,2020(2):hoaa009. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa009.
doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa009 |
[10] |
Fan Y, Zhang X, Hao Z, et al. Effectiveness of mild ovarian stimulation versus GnRH agonist protocol in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology: a meta-analysis[J]. Gynecol Endocrinol, 2017, 33(10):746-756. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2017.1320385.
doi: 10.1080/09513590.2017.1320385 URL |
[11] |
Liang Y, Guo Q, Wu XH, et al. Does the additional use of clomiphene citrate or letrozole for in vitro fertilization deserve more attention?[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2021, 21(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03668-x.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03668-x URL |
[12] |
Abbara A, Clarke SA, Dhillo WS. Novel Concepts for Inducing Final Oocyte Maturation in In Vitro Fertilization Treatment[J]. Endocr Rev, 2018, 39(5):593-628. doi: 10.1210/er.2017-00236.
doi: 10.1210/er.2017-00236 pmid: 29982525 |
[13] |
Mattawanon N, Spencer JB, Schirmer DA 3rd,et al. Fertility preservation options in transgender people: A review[J]. Rev Endocr Metab Disord, 2018, 19(3):231-242. doi: 10.1007/s11154-018-9462-3.
doi: 10.1007/s11154-018-9462-3 URL |
[14] |
Labarta E, Rodríguez-Varela C, Mariani G, et al. Serum Progesterone Profile Across the Mid and Late Luteal Phase in Artificial Cycles Is Associated With Pregnancy Outcome[J]. Front Endocrinol(Lausanne), 2021, 12:665717. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.665717.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.665717 |
[15] |
Zhou R, Zhang X, Huang L, et al. Association between serum estradiol levels prior to progesterone administration in artificial frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles and live birth rate: a retrospective study[J]. BJOG, 2021, 128(13):2092-2100. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16777.
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16777 URL |
[16] |
Yang Q, Zhu L, Jin L. Human Follicle in vitro Culture Including Activation, Growth, and Maturation: A Review of Research Progress[J]. Front Endocrinol(Lausanne), 2020, 11:548. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00548.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00548 |
[1] | WANG Jia-yi, JI Hui, LI Xin, LING Xiu-feng. Effect of Serum β-hCG Level on the Next Day of Dual Trigger in Antagonist Regimen on the Outcome of Fresh Embryo Transfer [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(6): 447-452. |
[2] | XIAO Nan, LI Yong-cheng, YAO Yi-ming, SUN Hong-wen, YAO Ru-qiang, CHEN Yong-jun, YIN Yu-chen, LUO Hai-ning. Associations between Phthalates Exposure and Inflammatory Cytokines in Ovarian Microenvironment [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(5): 353-360. |
[3] | JIANG Nan, ZHAO Xiao-li, LUAN Zu-qian, HUANG Zhi-yun, XIA Tian. Research Progress on the Correlation between Oxidative Stress and Aneuploidy in Oocytes of Aging Women [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(5): 415-419. |
[4] | LUO Sha-sha, WANG De-jing. Analysis of Influencing Factors of Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer Pregnancy Outcome [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(5): 420-424. |
[5] | WU Chun-lei, ZHAO Xiao-li, QIU Yun-huan, WANG Bao-juan, DONG Rong, LI Kai-xi, XIA Tian. Integration of Gene Expression Microarrays and Single-Cell Transcriptomics to Identify Intercellular Communication in the Endometrium of Recurrent Implantation Failure Patients [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(4): 265-273. |
[6] | WU Yu-xuan, MENG Zi-fan, DONG Li, JI Hui. The Effect of Time Interval between Hysteroscopic Polypectomy and Start of Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles on Pregnancy Outcomes [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(4): 274-278. |
[7] | LI Ning, ZHANG An-ni, HE Xiao-xia, ZHANG Xue-hong. A Nomogram Prediction Model for Gestational Hypertension after Frozen Embryo Transfer [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(3): 177-184. |
[8] | ZHANG Ai-yu, LUAN Cui-yu, WANG Dong-mei, JIANG Shuai. Analysis on the Status Quo and Influencing Factors of Medical Treatment Delay in Infertility Patients Undergoing IVF-ET [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(3): 190-194. |
[9] | GU Xu-zhao, SHEN Hao-fei, GAO Min, LIU A-hui, WANG Na, YANG Wen-jing, ZHANG Xue-hong. Didelphic Uterus Combined with Ovarian Pregnancy:A Case Report [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(2): 118-120. |
[10] | HAO Jia-li, HE Yu-jie. Evaluation of Fertility Quality of Life in Infertile Population and Analysis of Influencing Factors [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(2): 159-165. |
[11] | LIANG Jun-xia, YANG Yu-jie, ZHANG Li, GE Li-na, WANG Na-na, TIAN Ying, LIU Peng, YAN Meng. Risk Factors of Unusable Embryos for IVF/ICSI in Older Women [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(1): 1-6. |
[12] | WEN Xing-xing, CHAI Meng-han, YANG Ni, ZOU Hui-juan, ZHANG Zhi-guo, LI Lin, CHEN Bei-li. A Case of Oocyte Maturation Arrest Caused by Heterozygous Variation of TUBB8 Gene c.154-156del [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(1): 17-19. |
[13] | LI Cai-hua, GUO Pei-pei, JIANG Xiao-hua, FANG You-yan, ZHOU Ping, WEI Zhao-lian. Application Progress of Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(1): 68-73. |
[14] | ZHANG Yu-jie, WANG Wen-cheng, ZHANG Ning. Research Progress of GDF-9 and BMP-15 on Follicular Development and Insulin Resistance in PCOS [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2023, 42(6): 487-491. |
[15] | YE Ming-zhu, ZHENG Jie, LI Jie-peng, XU Li-xin. Application of Oocyte Cryopreservation in Patients with Iatrogenic Diminished Ovarian Reserve [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2023, 42(6): 498-502. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||