Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3): 193-198.doi: 10.12280/gjszjk.20220595
• Original Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Yao, YAN Xue, LIU Qian-qian, WEI Si-qi()
Received:
2022-12-29
Published:
2023-05-15
Online:
2023-05-18
Contact:
WEI Si-qi, E-mail: weisq@lzu.edu.cn
LI Yao, YAN Xue, LIU Qian-qian, WEI Si-qi. Analysis of Influencing Factors on Potential Categories of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms among Patients with Gynecologic Malignant Tumor[J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2023, 42(3): 193-198.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
项目 | 例(%) | 项目 | 例(%) |
---|---|---|---|
恶性肿瘤类型 | 慢性病史 | ||
宫颈癌 | 110(47.6) | 无 | 187(81.0) |
卵巢癌 | 64(27.7) | 有 | 44(19.0) |
子宫内膜癌 | 57(24.7) | 治疗方法 | |
文化程度 | 化疗 | 139(60.2) | |
小学及以下 | 156(67.5) | 新辅助化疗 | 52(22.5) |
初中 | 36(15.6) | 化疗联合放疗 | 12(5.2) |
高中及以上 | 39(16.9) | 新辅助放化疗 | 11(4.8) |
肿瘤FIGO分期 | 其他 | 17(7.3) | |
Ⅰ期 | 59(25.5) | 医疗费用支付方式 | |
Ⅱ期 | 119(51.5) | 城镇居民 | 22(9.5) |
Ⅲ期 | 45(19.5) | 城镇职工 | 35(15.2) |
Ⅳ期 | 8(3.5) | 新农合 | 166(71.9) |
宗教信仰 | 自费 | 8(3.4) | |
无 | 196(84.8) | 家庭人均月收入 | |
有 | 35(15.2) | <2 500元 | 89(38.5) |
家族史 | 2 500~5 000元 | 100(43.3) | |
无 | 202(87.4) | >5 000元 | 42(18.2) |
有 | 29(12.6) |
项目 | 例(%) | 项目 | 例(%) |
---|---|---|---|
恶性肿瘤类型 | 慢性病史 | ||
宫颈癌 | 110(47.6) | 无 | 187(81.0) |
卵巢癌 | 64(27.7) | 有 | 44(19.0) |
子宫内膜癌 | 57(24.7) | 治疗方法 | |
文化程度 | 化疗 | 139(60.2) | |
小学及以下 | 156(67.5) | 新辅助化疗 | 52(22.5) |
初中 | 36(15.6) | 化疗联合放疗 | 12(5.2) |
高中及以上 | 39(16.9) | 新辅助放化疗 | 11(4.8) |
肿瘤FIGO分期 | 其他 | 17(7.3) | |
Ⅰ期 | 59(25.5) | 医疗费用支付方式 | |
Ⅱ期 | 119(51.5) | 城镇居民 | 22(9.5) |
Ⅲ期 | 45(19.5) | 城镇职工 | 35(15.2) |
Ⅳ期 | 8(3.5) | 新农合 | 166(71.9) |
宗教信仰 | 自费 | 8(3.4) | |
无 | 196(84.8) | 家庭人均月收入 | |
有 | 35(15.2) | <2 500元 | 89(38.5) |
家族史 | 2 500~5 000元 | 100(43.3) | |
无 | 202(87.4) | >5 000元 | 42(18.2) |
有 | 29(12.6) |
类别 | AIC | BIC | aBIC | Entropy | P值(LMR) | 类别概率(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 5 102.937 | 5 130.476 | 5 105.121 | - | - | 100.0 |
2 | 4 582.543 | 4 627.294 | 4 586.092 | 0.991 | 0.000 | 84.1,15.9 |
3 | 4 266.486 | 4 328.449 | 4 271.400 | 0.928 | 0.000 | 42.0,42.4,15.6 |
4 | 4 170.270 | 4 249.445 | 4 176.548 | 0.928 | 0.000 | 20.3,15.5,34.2,30.0 |
5 | 4 113.759 | 4 210.146 | 4 121.402 | 0.925 | 0.002 | 20.4,33.6,10.9,19.6,15.5 |
6 | 4 086.963 | 4 200.563 | 4 095.972 | 0.929 | 0.113 | 5.9,18.7,10.6,29.3,15.5,20.0 |
类别 | AIC | BIC | aBIC | Entropy | P值(LMR) | 类别概率(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 5 102.937 | 5 130.476 | 5 105.121 | - | - | 100.0 |
2 | 4 582.543 | 4 627.294 | 4 586.092 | 0.991 | 0.000 | 84.1,15.9 |
3 | 4 266.486 | 4 328.449 | 4 271.400 | 0.928 | 0.000 | 42.0,42.4,15.6 |
4 | 4 170.270 | 4 249.445 | 4 176.548 | 0.928 | 0.000 | 20.3,15.5,34.2,30.0 |
5 | 4 113.759 | 4 210.146 | 4 121.402 | 0.925 | 0.002 | 20.4,33.6,10.9,19.6,15.5 |
6 | 4 086.963 | 4 200.563 | 4 095.972 | 0.929 | 0.113 | 5.9,18.7,10.6,29.3,15.5,20.0 |
项目 | n | 恶性肿瘤类型 | 文化程度 | 肿瘤FIGO分期 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宫颈癌 | 卵巢癌 | 子宫内膜癌 | 小学及以下 | 初中 | 高中及以上 | Ⅰ期 | Ⅱ期 | Ⅲ期 | Ⅳ期 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
中症状高唤醒型 | 97 | 42(43.3) | 30(30.9) | 25(25.8) | 60(61.9) | 17(17.5) | 20(20.6) | 25(25.8) | 48(49.5) | 20(20.6) | 4(4.1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
低症状型 | 98 | 48(49.0) | 25(25.5) | 25(25.5) | 66(67.4) | 16(16.3) | 16(16.3) | 25(25.5) | 50(51.0) | 20(20.4) | 3(3.1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
高症状高回避型 | 36 | 20(55.6) | 99(25.0) | 7(19.4) | 30(83.4) | 3(8.3) | 3(8.3) | 9(25.0) | 21(58.3) | 5(13.9) | 1(2.8) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
χ2或F或H | 1.998a | 5.656a | 1.365b | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P | 0.736 | 0.226 | 0.968 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
项目 | n | 宗教信仰 | 家族史 | 慢性病史 | 治疗方法 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
无 | 有 | 无 | 有 | 无 | 有 | 化疗 | 化疗联合放疗 | 其他 | 新辅助 放化疗 | 新辅助 化疗 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
中症状高唤醒型 | 97 | 84(86.6) | 13(13.4) | 84(86.6) | 13(13.4) | 73(75.3) | 24(24.7) | 58(59.8) | 6(6.2) | 5(5.2) | 6(6.2) | 22(22.6) | |||||||||||||||||||||
低症状型 | 98 | 81(82.7) | 17(17.3) | 86(87.8) | 12(12.2) | 86(87.8) | 12(12.2) | 57(58.2) | 5(5.1) | 9(9.2) | 4(4.1) | 23(23.4) | |||||||||||||||||||||
高症状高回避型 | 36 | 31(86.1) | 5(13.9) | 32(88.9) | 4(11.1) | 28(77.8) | 8(22.2) | 24(66.7) | 1(2.8) | 3(8.3) | 1(2.8) | 7(19.4) | |||||||||||||||||||||
χ2或F或H | 0.643a | 0.142b | 5.216a | 3.172b | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P | 0.725 | 0.932 | 0.074 | 0.923 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
项目 | n | 医疗费用支付方式 | 家庭人均月收入 | 年龄(岁) | 生育子女数(个) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
城镇居民 | 城镇职工 | 新农合 | 自费 | <2 500元 | 2 500~5 000元 | >5 000元 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
中症状高唤醒型 | 97 | 9(9.3) | 20(20.6) | 65(67.0) | 3(3.1) | 29(29.9) | 49(50.5) | 19(19.6) | 51.10±8.42 | 2.00(2.00,3.00) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
低症状型 | 98 | 9(9.2) | 13(13.3) | 73(74.5) | 3(3.0) | 41(41.8) | 38(38.8) | 19(19.4) | 52.24±9.65 | 3.00(2.00,4.00) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
高症状高回避型 | 36 | 4(11.0) | 2(5.6) | 28(77.8) | 2(5.6) | 19(52.8) | 13(36.1) | 4(11.0) | 50.44±7.94 | 2.00(1.25,2.00) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
χ2或F或H | 6.023b | 7.285a | 0.693c | 16.721d | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P | 0.421 | 0.122 | 0.501 | 0.000 |
项目 | n | 恶性肿瘤类型 | 文化程度 | 肿瘤FIGO分期 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宫颈癌 | 卵巢癌 | 子宫内膜癌 | 小学及以下 | 初中 | 高中及以上 | Ⅰ期 | Ⅱ期 | Ⅲ期 | Ⅳ期 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
中症状高唤醒型 | 97 | 42(43.3) | 30(30.9) | 25(25.8) | 60(61.9) | 17(17.5) | 20(20.6) | 25(25.8) | 48(49.5) | 20(20.6) | 4(4.1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
低症状型 | 98 | 48(49.0) | 25(25.5) | 25(25.5) | 66(67.4) | 16(16.3) | 16(16.3) | 25(25.5) | 50(51.0) | 20(20.4) | 3(3.1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
高症状高回避型 | 36 | 20(55.6) | 99(25.0) | 7(19.4) | 30(83.4) | 3(8.3) | 3(8.3) | 9(25.0) | 21(58.3) | 5(13.9) | 1(2.8) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
χ2或F或H | 1.998a | 5.656a | 1.365b | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P | 0.736 | 0.226 | 0.968 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
项目 | n | 宗教信仰 | 家族史 | 慢性病史 | 治疗方法 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
无 | 有 | 无 | 有 | 无 | 有 | 化疗 | 化疗联合放疗 | 其他 | 新辅助 放化疗 | 新辅助 化疗 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
中症状高唤醒型 | 97 | 84(86.6) | 13(13.4) | 84(86.6) | 13(13.4) | 73(75.3) | 24(24.7) | 58(59.8) | 6(6.2) | 5(5.2) | 6(6.2) | 22(22.6) | |||||||||||||||||||||
低症状型 | 98 | 81(82.7) | 17(17.3) | 86(87.8) | 12(12.2) | 86(87.8) | 12(12.2) | 57(58.2) | 5(5.1) | 9(9.2) | 4(4.1) | 23(23.4) | |||||||||||||||||||||
高症状高回避型 | 36 | 31(86.1) | 5(13.9) | 32(88.9) | 4(11.1) | 28(77.8) | 8(22.2) | 24(66.7) | 1(2.8) | 3(8.3) | 1(2.8) | 7(19.4) | |||||||||||||||||||||
χ2或F或H | 0.643a | 0.142b | 5.216a | 3.172b | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P | 0.725 | 0.932 | 0.074 | 0.923 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
项目 | n | 医疗费用支付方式 | 家庭人均月收入 | 年龄(岁) | 生育子女数(个) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
城镇居民 | 城镇职工 | 新农合 | 自费 | <2 500元 | 2 500~5 000元 | >5 000元 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
中症状高唤醒型 | 97 | 9(9.3) | 20(20.6) | 65(67.0) | 3(3.1) | 29(29.9) | 49(50.5) | 19(19.6) | 51.10±8.42 | 2.00(2.00,3.00) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
低症状型 | 98 | 9(9.2) | 13(13.3) | 73(74.5) | 3(3.0) | 41(41.8) | 38(38.8) | 19(19.4) | 52.24±9.65 | 3.00(2.00,4.00) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
高症状高回避型 | 36 | 4(11.0) | 2(5.6) | 28(77.8) | 2(5.6) | 19(52.8) | 13(36.1) | 4(11.0) | 50.44±7.94 | 2.00(1.25,2.00) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
χ2或F或H | 6.023b | 7.285a | 0.693c | 16.721d | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P | 0.421 | 0.122 | 0.501 | 0.000 |
组别 | n | 坚韧人格(分) | 焦虑(分) | 社会支持(分) |
---|---|---|---|---|
中症状高唤醒型 | 97 | 64.00(59.50,68.00) | 10.00(8.00,12.00) | 52.00(47.00,58.00) |
低症状型 | 98 | 67.00(59.75,72.25) | 5.00(4.00,8.00) | 55.50(49.75,62.00) |
高症状高回避型 | 36 | 57.00(48.25,60.00) | 16.00(12.00,17.00) | 50.50(33.25,56.00) |
H | 38.305 | 121.609 | 15.439 | |
P | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
组别 | n | 坚韧人格(分) | 焦虑(分) | 社会支持(分) |
---|---|---|---|---|
中症状高唤醒型 | 97 | 64.00(59.50,68.00) | 10.00(8.00,12.00) | 52.00(47.00,58.00) |
低症状型 | 98 | 67.00(59.75,72.25) | 5.00(4.00,8.00) | 55.50(49.75,62.00) |
高症状高回避型 | 36 | 57.00(48.25,60.00) | 16.00(12.00,17.00) | 50.50(33.25,56.00) |
H | 38.305 | 121.609 | 15.439 | |
P | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
因变量 | 自变量 | 回归系数 | 标准误 | Wald χ2 | P | OR | 95%CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
中症状高唤醒型 vs. 低症状型a | 常数项 | -0.786 | 1.736 | 0.205 | 0.651 | ||
生育子女数 | -0.401 | 0.167 | 5.762 | 0.016 | 0.669 | 0.482~0.929 | |
坚韧人格 | 0.005 | 0.020 | 0.070 | 0.791 | 1.005 | 0.967~1.045 | |
焦虑 | 0.504 | 0.076 | 43.568 | 0.000 | 1.655 | 1.425~1.923 | |
社会支持 | -0.046 | 0.018 | 6.846 | 0.009 | 0.955 | 0.922~0.988 | |
高症状高回避型 vs. 低症状型a | 常数项 | 6.017 | 3.601 | 2.792 | 0.095 | ||
生育子女数 | -1.174 | 0.352 | 11.135 | 0.001 | 0.309 | 0.155~0.616 | |
坚韧人格 | -0.146 | 0.052 | 7.727 | 0.005 | 0.864 | 0.780~0.958 | |
焦虑 | 0.880 | 0.117 | 56.066 | 0.000 | 2.410 | 1.914~3.034 | |
社会支持 | -0.080 | 0.030 | 7.254 | 0.007 | 0.923 | 0.870~0.978 | |
高症状高回避型 vs. 中症状高唤醒型b | 常数项 | 6.803 | 3.227 | 4.445 | 0.035 | ||
生育子女数 | -0.773 | 0.317 | 5.952 | 0.015 | 0.462 | 0.248~0.859 | |
坚韧人格 | -0.151 | 0.049 | 9.454 | 0.002 | 0.860 | 0.781~0.947 | |
焦虑 | 0.375 | 0.088 | 18.016 | 0.000 | 1.456 | 1.224~1.731 | |
社会支持 | -0.034 | 0.025 | 1.847 | 0.174 | 0.967 | 0.920~1.015 |
因变量 | 自变量 | 回归系数 | 标准误 | Wald χ2 | P | OR | 95%CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
中症状高唤醒型 vs. 低症状型a | 常数项 | -0.786 | 1.736 | 0.205 | 0.651 | ||
生育子女数 | -0.401 | 0.167 | 5.762 | 0.016 | 0.669 | 0.482~0.929 | |
坚韧人格 | 0.005 | 0.020 | 0.070 | 0.791 | 1.005 | 0.967~1.045 | |
焦虑 | 0.504 | 0.076 | 43.568 | 0.000 | 1.655 | 1.425~1.923 | |
社会支持 | -0.046 | 0.018 | 6.846 | 0.009 | 0.955 | 0.922~0.988 | |
高症状高回避型 vs. 低症状型a | 常数项 | 6.017 | 3.601 | 2.792 | 0.095 | ||
生育子女数 | -1.174 | 0.352 | 11.135 | 0.001 | 0.309 | 0.155~0.616 | |
坚韧人格 | -0.146 | 0.052 | 7.727 | 0.005 | 0.864 | 0.780~0.958 | |
焦虑 | 0.880 | 0.117 | 56.066 | 0.000 | 2.410 | 1.914~3.034 | |
社会支持 | -0.080 | 0.030 | 7.254 | 0.007 | 0.923 | 0.870~0.978 | |
高症状高回避型 vs. 中症状高唤醒型b | 常数项 | 6.803 | 3.227 | 4.445 | 0.035 | ||
生育子女数 | -0.773 | 0.317 | 5.952 | 0.015 | 0.462 | 0.248~0.859 | |
坚韧人格 | -0.151 | 0.049 | 9.454 | 0.002 | 0.860 | 0.781~0.947 | |
焦虑 | 0.375 | 0.088 | 18.016 | 0.000 | 1.456 | 1.224~1.731 | |
社会支持 | -0.034 | 0.025 | 1.847 | 0.174 | 0.967 | 0.920~1.015 |
[1] | Association AP. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders[M]. 4th ed. Washington: American Psychiatric Association APA, 1994. |
[2] |
Abbey G, Thompson SB, Hickish T, et al. A meta-analysis of prevalence rates and moderating factors for cancer-related post-traumatic stress disorder[J]. Psychooncology, 2015, 24(4):371-381. doi: 10.1002/pon.3654.
doi: 10.1002/pon.3654 pmid: 25146298 |
[3] |
张婵娟, 曹枫林, 崔乃雪. 妇科癌症术后化疗病人创伤后应激障碍症状的影响因素[J]. 护理研究, 2012, 26(33):3100-3102. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2012.33.016.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2012.33.016 |
[4] | 朱志慧. 创伤后应激障碍患者皮质醇、ACTH、情绪与临床症状的相关研究[D]. 石河子市: 石河子大学, 2018. |
[5] |
谷亚男, 钟意娟, 杨群. 创伤后应激障碍元认知理论及疗法的研究进展[J]. 华南国防医学杂志, 2021, 35(7):546-548. doi: 10.13730/j.issn.1009-2595.2021.07.017.
doi: 10.13730/j.issn.1009-2595.2021.07.017 |
[6] |
尹奎, 彭坚, 张君. 潜在剖面分析在组织行为领域中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(7):1056-1070. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.01056.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.01056 |
[7] |
倪平, 陈京立, 刘娜. 护理研究中量性研究的样本量估计[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2010, 45(4):378-380. doi: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2010.04.037.
doi: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2010.04.037 |
[8] |
Blevins CA, Weathers FW, Davis MT, et al. The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation[J]. J Trauma Stress, 2015, 28(6):489-498. doi: 10.1002/jts.22059.
doi: 10.1002/jts.22059 pmid: 26606250 |
[9] | 季林香. 乳腺癌患者创伤后应激障碍的症状结构及其影响因素研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2021. |
[10] |
卢国华, 于丽荣, 梁宝勇. 心理健康素质测评系统·中国成年人坚韧人格量表的编制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2012, 10(5):321-325. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2012.05.001
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2012.05.001 |
[11] |
王瑜, 陈然, 张岚. 广泛性焦虑量表-7在中国综合医院住院患者中的信效度研究[J]. 临床精神医学杂志, 2018, 28(3):168-171. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3220.2018.03.007.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3220.2018.03.007 |
[12] |
张帆, 朱树贞, 邓平基. 领悟社会支持量表在国内住院病人社会支持研究中的应用评价[J]. 护理研究, 2018, 32(13):2048-2052. doi: 10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2018.13.015.
doi: 10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2018.13.015 |
[13] | 王孟成, 毕向阳. 潜变量建模与Mplus应用-进阶篇[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2018. |
[14] |
Zhou X, Gao M, Wang W, et al. Patterns of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms among cancer patients: A latent profile analysis[J]. J Psychosom Res, 2019, 125:109788. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.109788.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.109788 |
[15] |
Jongedijk RA, van der Aa N, Haagen J, et al. Symptom severity in PTSD and comorbid psychopathology: A latent profile analysis among traumatized veterans[J]. J Anxiety Disord, 2019, 62:35-44. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.11.004.
doi: S0887-6185(17)30604-7 pmid: 30500478 |
[16] |
Adams SW, Allwood MA. Profiles of home violence and posttraumatic stress symptoms among young adults: Distinguishing between trauma and adversity using latent class analysis[J]. Psychol Trauma, 2021, 13(3):284-292. doi: 10.1037/tra0000973.
doi: 10.1037/tra0000973 URL |
[17] |
Carpenter JK, Bragdon L, Pineles SL. Conditioned physiological reactivity and PTSD symptoms across the menstrual cycle: Anxiety sensitivity as a moderator[J]. Psychol Trauma, 2022, 14(3):453-461. doi: 10.1037/tra0001129.
doi: 10.1037/tra0001129 pmid: 35175083 |
[18] |
von Känel R, Meister-Langraf RE, Barth J, et al. Course, Moderators, and Predictors of Acute Coronary Syndrome-Induced Post-traumatic Stress: A Secondary Analysis From the Myocardial Infarction-Stress Prevention Intervention Randomized Controlled Trial[J]. Front Psychiatry, 2021, 12:621284. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.621284.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.621284 |
[19] |
Viana AG, Hanna AE, Woodward EC, et al. Emotional Clarity, Anxiety Sensitivity, and PTSD Symptoms Among Trauma-Exposed Inpatient Adolescents[J]. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev, 2018, 49(1):146-154. doi: 10.1007/s10578-017-0736-x.
doi: 10.1007/s10578-017-0736-x URL |
[20] |
Barcroft JF, Galazis N, Jones BP, et al. Fertility treatment and cancers-the eternal conundrum: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Hum Reprod, 2021, 36(4):1093-1107. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa293.
doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa293 URL |
[21] |
汪丹丹, 张苇, 郑蔚, 等. 生育咨询及教育干预对年轻妇科恶性肿瘤患者生育忧虑的影响[J]. 护理学杂志, 2020, 35(18):4-7. doi:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2020.18.004.
doi: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2020.18.004 |
[22] |
Jittayuthd S, Karl A. Rejection sensitivity and vulnerable attachment: associations with social support and PTSD symptoms in trauma survivors[J]. Eur J Psychotraumatol, 2022, 13(1):2027676. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2022.2027676.
doi: 10.1080/20008198.2022.2027676 |
[23] |
Pang X, Li F, Zhang Y. The Role of Mental Adjustment in Mediating Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms and Social Support in Chinese Ovarian Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study[J]. Psychol Res Behav Manag, 2022, 15:2183-2191. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S372660.
doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S372660 URL |
[24] |
王倩, 王俊芝, 成杰, 等. 脑损伤患者创伤后应激障碍与正念觉知水平、人格韧性的关系[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2021, 41(13):2872-2875. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2021.13.053.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2021.13.053 |
[25] |
Thomassen ÅG, Hystad SW, Johnsen BH, et al. The effect of hardiness on PTSD symptoms: A prospective mediational approach[J]. Military Psychology, 2018, 30(2): 142-151.doi:10.1080/08995605.2018.1425065.
doi: 10.1080/08995605.2018.1425065 URL |
[1] | SONG Dan-ni, ZHU Rong, PU Cong-shan, WANG Yi-ting, JIANG Wei-wei, HU Shuang, SHAN Chun-jian. Latent Profile Analysis of Distress Disclosure in Patients Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(6): 441-446. |
[2] | LI Miao-miao, JIANG Hong, CAI Peng-da. Influence Factor Analysis and Forecasting Research of Embryonic Arrest [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(4): 332-337. |
[3] | ZHANG Ai-yu, LUAN Cui-yu, WANG Dong-mei, JIANG Shuai. Analysis on the Status Quo and Influencing Factors of Medical Treatment Delay in Infertility Patients Undergoing IVF-ET [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(3): 190-194. |
[4] | HAO Jia-li, HE Yu-jie. Evaluation of Fertility Quality of Life in Infertile Population and Analysis of Influencing Factors [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(2): 159-165. |
[5] | LUO Li-yan, JIN Ye, SHI Li, HAN Mei, YU Ran, SONG Dong-hong. Stigma and Influencing Factors in Infertile Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(1): 6-10. |
[6] | DING Kai, ZHAO Chun, LING Xiu-feng, LI Xin. Analysis of Factors Affecting Clinical Pregnancy during Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer and Construction of Prediction Model of Nomogram [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2023, 42(5): 353-360. |
[7] | LYU Xiang-yang, REN Xiao-shuang, ZHANG Liang, XU Ji-qun, WU Hai-cui. Influencing Factors of Psychological Resilience in Infertile Patients with Obese Polycystic Ovary Syndrome [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2022, 41(6): 452-455. |
[8] | XIE Lei, PEI Meng-yue, DONG Lu, LI Shuai-tong, YANG Yuan, HU Jun-ping. Status and Influencing Factors of Social Alienation in Infertility Patients [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2022, 41(5): 382-385. |
[9] | LIU Guang-pu, ZHAO Ling, WANG Sheng-pu, REN Wei-na, ZHANG Hui-xin. Intrapartum Factors Influencing Vaginal Birth after Cesarean [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2022, 41(3): 195-198. |
[10] | ZHANG Yi-wen, LI Rong. Analysis of Factors Affecting the Clinical Outcomes after Hysteroscopy and Endometrial Biopsy in Patients with Repeated Implantation Failure [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2021, 40(1): 23-28. |
[11] | YUAN Li,CHU Ai-qin,XU An-lan,ZHANG Peng-nian,CHU Xia-fei. Current Status of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in Women of Fertile Age and Its Related Factors [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2020, 39(3): 210-212. |
[12] | LIU Ting-ting,KONG Wei-min, JIA Ning-yi, HAN Chao, HU Xiao-di, SONG Dan. Influencing Factors of Sexual Dysfunction in Women with Human Papilloma Virus Infection [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2020, 39(1): 35-39. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||