国际生殖健康/计划生育 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 46-51.doi: 10.12280/gjszjk.20210534
收稿日期:
2021-11-15
出版日期:
2022-01-15
发布日期:
2022-02-17
通讯作者:
王晓红
E-mail:wangxh919@fmmu.edu.cn
QIU Dan-er, ZHANG Wan-lin, WANG Xiao-hong()
Received:
2021-11-15
Published:
2022-01-15
Online:
2022-02-17
Contact:
WANG Xiao-hong
E-mail:wangxh919@fmmu.edu.cn
摘要:
宫腔镜下宫腔粘连分离术是治疗宫腔粘连的最常用方法,但术后粘连复发率高,妊娠结局不理想,因此术后常需联合辅助治疗措施改善预后。传统辅助治疗措施主要包括物理屏障以及口服或局部应用药物等,其中宫内放置Foley导管常与口服雌激素联合应用,因其疗效稳定、性价比高等优点在临床上应用已久。近年来以生物制剂和生物材料为基础的多种新型辅助治疗措施逐渐应用于宫腔粘连分离术后,其中富血小板血浆和干细胞等生物制剂在促进子宫内膜修复、改善生殖结局等方面显示出了更好的治疗效果。此外,基于凝胶、支架等生物材料的新型辅助治疗措施也显示出了良好的治疗作用,为难治性宫腔粘连带来了希望。综述宫腔粘连分离术后传统及新型辅助治疗措施的研究进展,为宫腔粘连的综合治疗提供新的临床思路。
邱丹儿, 张琬琳, 王晓红. 宫腔粘连分离术后预防复发和改善生殖结局的辅助治疗措施[J]. 国际生殖健康/计划生育, 2022, 41(1): 46-51.
QIU Dan-er, ZHANG Wan-lin, WANG Xiao-hong. Postoperative Adjuvant Measures for Preventing Adhesion Recurrence and Improving the Reproductive Outcome after Hysteroscopic Adhsiolysis[J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2022, 41(1): 46-51.
[1] |
Myers EM, Hurst BS. Comprehensive management of severe Asherman syndrome and amenorrhea[J]. Fertil Steril, 2012, 97(1):160-164. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.10.036.
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.10.036 URL |
[2] |
Lin X, Wei M, Li TC, et al. A comparison of intrauterine balloon, intrauterine contraceptive device and hyaluronic acid gel in the prevention of adhesion reformation following hysteroscopic surgery for Asherman syndrome: a cohort study[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2013, 170(2):512-516. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.07.018.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.07.018 URL |
[3] |
Haimov-Kochman R, Doviner V, Amsalem H, et al. Intraperitoneal levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device following uterine perforation: the role of progestins in adhesion formation[J]. Hum Reprod, 2003, 18(5):990-993. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg203.
doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg203 pmid: 12721174 |
[4] |
Orhue AA, Aziken ME, Igbefoh JO. A comparison of two adjunctive treatments for intrauterine adhesions following lysis[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2003, 82(1):49-56. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(03)00030-4.
doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(03)00030-4 URL |
[5] |
Zhu R, Duan H, Gan L, et al. Comparison of Intrauterine Suitable Balloon and Foley Balloon in the Prevention of Adhesion after Hysteroscopic Adhesiolysis[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2018, 2018:9494101. doi: 10.1155/2018/9494101.
doi: 10.1155/2018/9494101 pmid: 30533444 |
[6] |
Chen Y, Liu L, Luo Y, et al. Effects of Aspirin and Intrauterine Balloon on Endometrial Repair and Reproductive Prognosis in Patients with Severe Intrauterine Adhesion: A Prospective Cohort Study[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2017, 2017:8526104. doi: 10.1155/2017/8526104.
doi: 10.1155/2017/8526104 |
[7] |
Liu L, Huang X, Xia E, et al. A cohort study comparing 4 mg and 10 mg daily doses of postoperative oestradiol therapy to prevent adhesion reformation after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis[J]. Hum Fertil(Camb), 2019, 22(3):191-197. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2018.1444798.
doi: 10.1080/14647273.2018.1444798 |
[8] |
Guo J, Li TC, Liu Y, et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing two doses of oestrogen therapy after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis to prevent intrauterine adhesion recurrence[J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2017, 35(5):555-561. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.07.011.
doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.07.011 URL |
[9] |
Ge J, Chen Y, Yang H, et al. Expression and significance of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor in endometrial tissue of patients with intrauterine adhesions[J]. Gland Surg, 2021, 10(4):1478-1486. doi: 10.21037/gs-21-232.
doi: 10.21037/gs-21-232 URL |
[10] |
陈芳, 段华, 张颖, 等. 不同水平雌激素在宫腔粘连形成中的作用及相关机制[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2010, 45(12):917-920. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2010.12.009.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2010.12.009 |
[11] |
Chi Y, He P, Lei L, et al. Transdermal estrogen gel and oral aspirin combination therapy improves fertility prognosis via the promotion of endometrial receptivity in moderate to severe intrauterine adhesion[J]. Mol Med Rep, 2018, 17(5):6337-6344. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2018.8685.
doi: 10.3892/mmr.2018.8685 |
[12] | 陈中萍, 黄鹰, 李德梅. 小剂量阿司匹林对宫腔粘连电切术子宫内膜及其血流变化的影响[J]. 药品评价, 2019, 16(12):37-39. |
[13] |
毛利云, 朱铮, 王屹雯, 等. 补肾填精行气活血法治疗中重度宫腔粘连疗效研究[J]. 陕西中医, 2020, 41(12):1731-1734. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7369.2020.12.013.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7369.2020.12.013 |
[14] |
刘瑾, 肖西峰, 苗叶, 等. 重度宫腔粘连术后应用麒麟丸联合人工周期治疗临床疗效观察[J]. 生殖医学杂志, 2019, 28(9):1038-1042. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3845.2019.09.010.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3845.2019.09.010 |
[15] |
何珍英. 金凤丸联合生物电刺激用于中重度宫腔粘连术后治疗的临床研究[J]. 智慧健康, 2020, 6(35):33-34,39. doi: 10.19335/j.cnki.2096-1219.2020.35.014.
doi: 10.19335/j.cnki.2096-1219.2020.35.014 |
[16] |
王剑, 曹敏. 定坤丹对宫腔粘连患者宫腔镜术后再粘连的预防及相关细胞因子的影响[J]. 湖南中医药大学学报, 2018, 38(8):913-916. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-070X.2018.08.017.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-070X.2018.08.017 |
[17] |
Wu DC, Boyd AS, Wood KJ. Embryonic stem cell transplantation: potential applicability in cell replacement therapy and regenerative medicine[J]. Front Biosci, 2007, 12:4525-4535. doi: 10.2741/2407.
doi: 10.2741/2407 URL |
[18] |
Ding DC, Shyu WC, Lin SZ. Mesenchymal stem cells[J]. Cell Transplant, 2011, 20(1):5-14. doi: 10.3727/096368910X.
doi: 10.3727/096368910X URL |
[19] |
Gargett CE, Ye L. Endometrial reconstruction from stem cells[J]. Fertil Steril, 2012, 98(1):11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.004.
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.004 URL |
[20] |
Sun H, Lu J, Li B, et al. Partial regeneration of uterine horns in rats through adipose-derived stem cell sheets[J]. Biol Reprod, 2018, 99(5):1057-1069. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioy121.
doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioy121 URL |
[21] |
Santamaria X, Cabanillas S, Cervelló I, et al. Autologous cell therapy with CD133+ bone marrow-derived stem cells for refractory Asherman′s syndrome and endometrial atrophy: a pilot cohort study[J]. Hum Reprod, 2016, 31(5):1087-1096. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew042.
doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew042 URL |
[22] |
Ma H, Liu M, Li Y, et al. Intrauterine transplantation of autologous menstrual blood stem cells increases endometrial thickness and pregnancy potential in patients with refractory intrauterine adhesion[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2020, 46(11):2347-2355. doi: 10.1111/jog.14449.
doi: 10.1111/jog.14449 URL |
[23] |
Nguyen HP, Simpson RJ, Salamonsen LA, et al. Extracellular Vesicles in the Intrauterine Environment: Challenges and Potential Functions[J]. Biol Reprod, 2016, 95(5):109. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.116.143503.
doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.116.143503 pmid: 27655784 |
[24] |
Zhao S, Qi W, Zheng J, et al. Exosomes Derived from Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cells Restore Functional Endometrium in a Rat Model of Intrauterine Adhesions[J]. Reprod Sci, 2020, 27(6):1266-1275. doi: 10.1007/s43032-019-00112-6.
doi: 10.1007/s43032-019-00112-6 URL |
[25] |
Saribas GS, Ozogul C, Tiryaki M, et al. Effects of uterus derived mesenchymal stem cells and their exosomes on asherman's syndrome[J]. Acta Histochem, 2020, 122(1):151465. doi: 10.1016/j.acthis.2019.151465.
doi: 10.1016/j.acthis.2019.151465 URL |
[26] |
Liang L, Wang L, Zhou S, et al. Exosomes derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells repair injured endometrial epithelial cells[J]. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2020, 37(2):395-403. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01687-4.
doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01687-4 URL |
[27] |
Keshtkar S, Azarpira N, Ghahremani MH. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles: novel frontiers in regenerative medicine[J]. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2018, 9(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13287-018-0791-7.
doi: 10.1186/s13287-018-0791-7 pmid: 29523213 |
[28] |
Lv CX, Duan H, Wang S, et al. Exosomes Derived from Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells Promote Proliferation of Allogeneic Endometrial Stromal Cells[J]. Reprod Sci, 2020, 27(6):1372-1381. doi: 10.1007/s43032-020-00165-y.
doi: 10.1007/s43032-020-00165-y URL |
[29] |
Amable PR, Carias RB, Teixeira MV, et al. Platelet-rich plasma preparation for regenerative medicine: optimization and quantification of cytokines and growth factors[J]. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2013, 4(3):67. doi: 10.1186/scrt218.
doi: 10.1186/scrt218 URL |
[30] |
Foster TE, Puskas BL, Mandelbaum BR, et al. Platelet-rich plasma: from basic science to clinical applications[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2009, 37(11):2259-2272. doi: 10.1177/0363546509349921.
doi: 10.1177/0363546509349921 URL |
[31] |
Segabinazzi L, Canisso IF, Podico G, et al. Intrauterine Blood Plasma Platelet-Therapy Mitigates Persistent Breeding-Induced Endometritis, Reduces Uterine Infections, and Improves Embryo Recovery in Mares[J]. Antibiotics(Basel), 2021, 10(5):490. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10050490.
doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10050490 |
[32] |
Kim JH, Park M, Paek JY, et al. Intrauterine Infusion of Human Platelet-Rich Plasma Improves Endometrial Regeneration and Pregnancy Outcomes in a Murine Model of Asherman′s Syndrome[J]. Front Physiol, 2020, 11:105. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00105.
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00105 URL |
[33] | Chang Y, Li J, Chen Y, et al. Autologous platelet-rich plasma promotes endometrial growth and improves pregnancy outcome during in vitro fertilization[J]. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2015, 8(1):1286-1290. |
[34] |
Frantz N, Ferreira M, Kulmann MI, et al. Platelet-Rich plasma as an effective alternative approach for improving endometrial receptivity - a clinical retrospective study[J]. JBRA Assist Reprod, 2020, 24(4):442-446. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20200026.
doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20200026 |
[35] |
Li X, Lv HF, Zhao R, et al. Recent developments in bio-scaffold materials as delivery strategies for therapeutics for endometrium regeneration[J]. Mater Today Bio, 2021, 11:100101. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2021.100101.
doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2021.100101 |
[36] |
Xu B, Cao Y, Zheng Z, et al. Injectable Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Laden Matrigel Microspheres for Endometrium Repair and Regeneration[J]. Adv Biol(Weinh), 2021, 5(8):e2000202. doi: 10.1002/adbi.202000202.
doi: 10.1002/adbi.202000202 |
[37] |
Jahanbani Y, Davaran S, Ghahremani-Nasab M, et al. Scaffold-based tissue engineering approaches in treating infertility[J]. Life Sci, 2020, 240:117066. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.117066.
doi: S0024-3205(19)30993-2 pmid: 31738881 |
[38] |
Zhao YX, Chen SR, Huang QY, et al. Repair abilities of mouse autologous adipose-derived stem cells and Shake Gel 3D complex local injection with intrauterine adhesion by BMP7-Smad5 signaling pathway activation[J]. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2021, 12(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s13287-021-02258-0.
doi: 10.1186/s13287-021-02258-0 URL |
[39] |
Xin L, Lin X, Zhou F, et al. A scaffold laden with mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes for promoting endometrium regeneration and fertility restoration through macrophage immunomodulation[J]. Acta Biomater, 2020, 113:252-266. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.06.029.
doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.06.029 URL |
[40] |
Cao Y, Sun H, Zhu H, et al. Allogeneic cell therapy using umbilical cord MSCs on collagen scaffolds for patients with recurrent uterine adhesion: a phase I clinical trial[J]. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2018, 9(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s13287-018-0904-3.
doi: 10.1186/s13287-018-0904-3 URL |
[1] | 吴宇轩, 孟子凡, 董丽, 季慧. 宫腔镜子宫内膜息肉手术后冻融胚胎移植时机对妊娠结局的影响[J]. 国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志, 2024, 43(4): 274-278. |
[2] | 宗嬿, 陈宜爽, 徐莲薇. 围绝经期睡眠障碍的发病机制[J]. 国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志, 2024, 43(2): 166-171. |
[3] | 任缘, 孟昱时. 薄型子宫内膜的病理生理特征和治疗的研究进展[J]. 国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志, 2024, 43(1): 58-62. |
[4] | 向春蓉, 邓志敏, 代芳芳, 程艳香. 间充质干细胞及其外泌体治疗早发性卵巢功能不全的临床研究及其进展[J]. 国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志, 2023, 42(6): 492-497. |
[5] | 刘洪江, 姜小花, 魏兆莲. 间充质干细胞及其联合生物材料支架在宫腔粘连治疗中的应用[J]. 国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志, 2023, 42(5): 424-430. |
[6] | 姚欣怡, 俞凌. 宫腔粘连治疗的新进展[J]. 国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志, 2023, 42(5): 431-436. |
[7] | 柳絮, 杨爱军, 李泽武, 石城, 刘利君, 孔潇丽, 王靖雯. 富血小板血浆改善卵巢储备功能的相关机制[J]. 国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志, 2023, 42(4): 329-333. |
[8] | 熊书云, 孙可丰, 李钰珂, 许莹鸿, 刘明浩. 干细胞治疗薄型子宫内膜的研究进展[J]. 国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志, 2023, 42(4): 334-338. |
[9] | 许阡, 彭燕蓁, 柳鑫, 陈曦. 子宫两处动静脉瘘合并胚物残留一例[J]. 国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志, 2023, 42(3): 206-210. |
[10] | 廖代娅, 李雪, 乔志莉, 廖祥余, 张科荣. 妊娠合并宫腔粘连“墙”一例[J]. 国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志, 2023, 42(3): 218-220. |
[11] | 张雨婷, 朱媛, 周建军. 子宫纵隔不孕症患者行宫腔镜子宫纵隔切除术后IVF/ICSI结局分析[J]. 国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志, 2023, 42(1): 18-22. |
[12] | 李光璨, 翟超, 张晓轩, 任春娥. 转化生长因子β1在宫腔粘连中的研究进展[J]. 国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志, 2023, 42(1): 83-88. |
[13] | 许阡, 成九梅. 成年女性阴道异物滞留10年一例[J]. 国际生殖健康/计划生育, 2022, 41(6): 472-475. |
[14] | 沈艳清, 陈煌, 陈烨. 干细胞治疗子宫内膜损伤的研究进展[J]. 国际生殖健康/计划生育, 2022, 41(4): 322-326. |
[15] | 张明玮, 漆倩荣, 谢青贞. 宫腔微生物与女性生殖健康疾病的关系[J]. 国际生殖健康/计划生育, 2022, 41(3): 214-218. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||