国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 412-417.doi: 10.12280/gjszjk.20260287

• 综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

深部浸润型子宫内膜异位症合并不孕症的治疗路径选择:手术还是IVF?

李晓莲, 张梦宇, 陶慧敏, 樊雨邗, 李梅, 尹耀学, 侯振,△()   

  1. 210029 南京医科大学第一附属医院生殖医学科(李晓莲, 陶慧敏, 樊雨邗,李梅,尹耀学,侯振);无锡市妇幼保健院妇产科(张梦宇);江苏省人民医院宿迁医院生殖医学科(侯振)
  • 收稿日期:2026-05-31 出版日期:2026-09-15 发布日期:2026-09-20
  • 通讯作者: 侯振,E-mail:zhhou1981@126.com
  • 作者简介:△审校者
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(82101728);江苏省自然科学基金(BK20191491);宿迁市科技项目(SY202421)

Treatment Pathways Selection for Deeply Infiltrating Endometriosis with Infertility: Surgery or IVF?

LI Xiao-lian, ZHANG Meng-yu, TAO Hui-min, FAN Yu-han, LI Mei, YIN Yao-xue, HOU Zhen,△()   

  1. Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China (LI Xiao-lian, TAO Hui-min, FAN Yu-han, LI Mei, YIN Yao-xue, HOU Zhen); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wuxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Wuxi 214002, Jiangsu Province, China (ZHANG Meng-yu); Department of Reproductive Medicine, Jiangsu Province (Suqian) Hospital, Suqian 223800, Jiangsu Province, China (HOU Zhen)
  • Received:2026-05-31 Published:2026-09-15 Online:2026-09-20
  • Contact: HOU Zhen, E-mail: zhhou1981@126.com

摘要:

深部浸润型子宫内膜异位症(deeply infiltrating endometriosis,DIE)是子宫内膜异位症的一种特殊形式,约26%的DIE患者合并不孕。现有证据表明,手术与体外受精(in vitro fertilization,IVF)均为DIE合并不孕症患者的有效治疗策略,二者具有相似的生育结局,但尚无明确的临床决策依据。通过系统比较手术与IVF的生育结局,整合影像学评估、子宫内膜异位症生育指数(endometriosis fertility index,EFI)评分及卵巢储备影响,提出决策参考。影像学检查有助于明确病灶范围、预判手术难度从而避免不必要的手术。EFI评分是预测术后自然妊娠最可靠的工具:低分者建议直接IVF,高分者可考虑术后试孕。手术可损伤DIE患者的卵巢储备功能,对卵巢储备功能减退者应优先IVF。荟萃分析显示手术与IVF整体生育结局无显著差异,但手术在EFI评分高、疼痛明显者中可能额外获益。因此,直接IVF应作为一线治疗优先考虑,手术主要适用于重度疼痛、器官梗阻风险及特定EFI评分高的患者。

关键词: 子宫内膜异位症, 不育, 女(雌)性, 妇科外科手术, 体外受精, 深部浸润型子宫内膜异位症

Abstract:

Deeply infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) is a special form of endometriosis, in which about 26% of patients are complicated by infertility. Existing evidence shows that both surgery and in vitro fertilization (IVF) are effective treatment strategies for DIE patients with infertility, and that they have similar reproductive outcomes. However, there is no clear basis for clinical decision-making. In this review, we systematically compared the reproductive outcomes of surgery and IVF, integrated imaging evaluation, endometriosis fertility index (EFI) score and ovarian reserve, and proposed the decision-making reference. Imaging examination is helpful to clarify the scope of the lesion, predict the difficulty of surgery, and avoid unnecessary surgery. EFI score is the core tool for predicting the postoperative natural pregnancy: those patients with low EFI score should be suggested direct IVF, and those with high EFI score can be considered postoperative pregnancy test. Operation may damage the ovarian reserve function of DIE patients, and IVF should be given priority to those patients with diminished ovarian reserve. Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the overall fertility outcomes between surgery and IVF, but surgery may have additional benefits in patients with high EFI scores and severe pain. Direct IVF should be considered preferentially as the first-line treatment, while surgery is mainly suitable for patients with severe pain, organ obstruction risk and specific high EFI scores.

Key words: Endometriosis, Infertility, female, Gynecologic surgical procedures, Fertilization in vitro, Deeply infiltrating endometriosis