
Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 6-10.doi: 10.12280/gjszjk.20250524
• Original Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Huan, CHEN Yi, JIANG Xiang-long, CHEN Sheng-hui, XIONG Qing(
)
Received:2025-10-17
Published:2026-01-15
Online:2026-02-02
Contact:
XIONG Qing
E-mail:574430057@qq.com
LI Huan, CHEN Yi, JIANG Xiang-long, CHEN Sheng-hui, XIONG Qing. Application of Soybean Lecithin in the Cryopreservation of Human Sperm[J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2026, 45(1): 6-10.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
| 精子类别 | n | 精子浓度 (×106/mL) | PR (%) | VAP (μm/s) | VCL (μm/s) | TM (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 正常精子 | 92 | 69.5±25.2 | 46.8±7.8 | 38.3±7.2 | 65.0±8.1 | 57.5±8.9 |
| 弱活力精子 | 64 | 43.8±15.6 | 22.7±6.9 | 26.0±5.8 | 45.4±7.9 | 29.9±6.7 |
| t | 7.847 | 19.858 | 11.881 | 14.948 | 20.977 | |
| P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 精子类别 | n | 精子浓度 (×106/mL) | PR (%) | VAP (μm/s) | VCL (μm/s) | TM (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 正常精子 | 92 | 69.5±25.2 | 46.8±7.8 | 38.3±7.2 | 65.0±8.1 | 57.5±8.9 |
| 弱活力精子 | 64 | 43.8±15.6 | 22.7±6.9 | 26.0±5.8 | 45.4±7.9 | 29.9±6.7 |
| t | 7.847 | 19.858 | 11.881 | 14.948 | 20.977 | |
| P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 组别 | 正常精子(n=92) | 弱活力精子(n=64) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PR(%) | VAP(μm/s) | VCL(μm/s) | TM(%) | PR(%) | VAP(μm/s) | VCL(μm/s) | TM(%) | |
| EY组 | 41.9±5.1 | 39.0±4.3 | 67.9±5.8 | 56.5±6.8 | 20.4±3.2 | 24.8±4.0 | 43.3±5.6 | 29.1±3.8 |
| 1% SL组 | 36.2±5.1ab | 33.3±4.0ab | 58.1±4.6ab | 49.1±5.8ab | 16.8±3.2ab | 20.4±2.9ab | 36.6±4.8ab | 24.3±3.0ab |
| 2% SL组 | 42.1±3.6 | 38.1±4.3 | 65.6±5.4a | 56.0±3.1 | 21.4±3.1 | 24.8±3.8 | 41.0±5.1a | 27.6±4.0a |
| 3% SL组 | 33.6±3.9ab | 30.1±3.8ab | 52.1±5.0ab | 45.8±5.7ab | 14.5±3.0ab | 18.2±3.0ab | 34.2±4.2ab | 20.9±3.2ab |
| 5% SL组 | 28.9±4.5ab | 28.1±3.7ab | 50.3±3.6ab | 42.6±5.5ab | 12.9±2.8ab | 16.0±3.3ab | 33.0±4.3ab | 19.1±3.2ab |
| F | 145.464 | 131.146 | 236.675 | 115.356 | 89.657 | 83.353 | 53.805 | 96.890 |
| P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 组别 | 正常精子(n=92) | 弱活力精子(n=64) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PR(%) | VAP(μm/s) | VCL(μm/s) | TM(%) | PR(%) | VAP(μm/s) | VCL(μm/s) | TM(%) | |
| EY组 | 41.9±5.1 | 39.0±4.3 | 67.9±5.8 | 56.5±6.8 | 20.4±3.2 | 24.8±4.0 | 43.3±5.6 | 29.1±3.8 |
| 1% SL组 | 36.2±5.1ab | 33.3±4.0ab | 58.1±4.6ab | 49.1±5.8ab | 16.8±3.2ab | 20.4±2.9ab | 36.6±4.8ab | 24.3±3.0ab |
| 2% SL组 | 42.1±3.6 | 38.1±4.3 | 65.6±5.4a | 56.0±3.1 | 21.4±3.1 | 24.8±3.8 | 41.0±5.1a | 27.6±4.0a |
| 3% SL组 | 33.6±3.9ab | 30.1±3.8ab | 52.1±5.0ab | 45.8±5.7ab | 14.5±3.0ab | 18.2±3.0ab | 34.2±4.2ab | 20.9±3.2ab |
| 5% SL组 | 28.9±4.5ab | 28.1±3.7ab | 50.3±3.6ab | 42.6±5.5ab | 12.9±2.8ab | 16.0±3.3ab | 33.0±4.3ab | 19.1±3.2ab |
| F | 145.464 | 131.146 | 236.675 | 115.356 | 89.657 | 83.353 | 53.805 | 96.890 |
| P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 组别 | 正常精子(n=92) | 弱活力精子(n=64) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFI (%) | 正常精子 形态率(%) | DFI (%) | 正常精子 形态率(%) | |
| EY组 | 22.0±2.7a | 38.2±4.0a | 27.7±2.2a | 33.0±2.9a |
| 1% SL组 | 24.1±2.6a | 37.4±4.4a | 28.4±2.3a | 30.3±4.0a |
| 2% SL组 | 16.7±1.8 | 45.3±3.9 | 24.6±2.1 | 39.0±4.1 |
| 3% SL组 | 26.2±1.9a | 36.1±3.8a | 28.3±2.1a | 28.4±4.3a |
| 5% SL组 | 29.1±2.6a | 31.4±2.9a | 31.2±2.2a | 28.2±3.3a |
| F | 371.022 | 156.699 | 72.553 | 90.550 |
| P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 组别 | 正常精子(n=92) | 弱活力精子(n=64) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFI (%) | 正常精子 形态率(%) | DFI (%) | 正常精子 形态率(%) | |
| EY组 | 22.0±2.7a | 38.2±4.0a | 27.7±2.2a | 33.0±2.9a |
| 1% SL组 | 24.1±2.6a | 37.4±4.4a | 28.4±2.3a | 30.3±4.0a |
| 2% SL组 | 16.7±1.8 | 45.3±3.9 | 24.6±2.1 | 39.0±4.1 |
| 3% SL组 | 26.2±1.9a | 36.1±3.8a | 28.3±2.1a | 28.4±4.3a |
| 5% SL组 | 29.1±2.6a | 31.4±2.9a | 31.2±2.2a | 28.2±3.3a |
| F | 371.022 | 156.699 | 72.553 | 90.550 |
| P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 组别 | 正常精子(n=92) | 弱活力精子(n=64) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOST阳性率(%) | 活细胞率 (%) | HOST阳性率(%) | 活细胞率 (%) | |
| EY组 | 53.2±5.0 | 51.3±4.6 | 44.2±4.9 | 44.2±5.3 |
| 1% SL组 | 38.0±5.0ab | 37.2±4.9ab | 34.0±4.0ab | 34.8±4.8ab |
| 2% SL组 | 52.1±2.9 | 50.8±4.2 | 42.7±3.5 | 42.9±3.4 |
| 3% SL组 | 42.5±4.1ab | 41.9±3.8ab | 32.6±3.9ab | 29.7±4.3ab |
| 5% SL组 | 38.1±3.0ab | 36.9±3.1ab | 29.9±3.6ab | 31.3±4.3ab |
| F | 302.456 | 263.947 | 164.037 | 142.451 |
| P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 组别 | 正常精子(n=92) | 弱活力精子(n=64) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOST阳性率(%) | 活细胞率 (%) | HOST阳性率(%) | 活细胞率 (%) | |
| EY组 | 53.2±5.0 | 51.3±4.6 | 44.2±4.9 | 44.2±5.3 |
| 1% SL组 | 38.0±5.0ab | 37.2±4.9ab | 34.0±4.0ab | 34.8±4.8ab |
| 2% SL组 | 52.1±2.9 | 50.8±4.2 | 42.7±3.5 | 42.9±3.4 |
| 3% SL组 | 42.5±4.1ab | 41.9±3.8ab | 32.6±3.9ab | 29.7±4.3ab |
| 5% SL组 | 38.1±3.0ab | 36.9±3.1ab | 29.9±3.6ab | 31.3±4.3ab |
| F | 302.456 | 263.947 | 164.037 | 142.451 |
| P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 组别 | 正常精子(n=92) | 弱活力精子(n=64) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROS(AU) | SOD(U/mL) | MDA(nmol/mL) | ROS(AU) | SOD(U/mL) | MDA(nmol/mL) | |
| EY组 | 360.1±40.1a | 195.1±11.5a | 2.5±0.3a | 483.7±51.0a | 146.5±11.5a | 2.6±0.2a |
| 1% SL组 | 378.8±36.3a | 169.1±8.9a | 2.7±0.2a | 510.1±51.4a | 134.1±10.5a | 3.1±0.3a |
| 2% SL组 | 272.0±33.1 | 238.3±14.7 | 1.9±0.2 | 419.1±38.8 | 167.8±15.1 | 2.2±0.2 |
| 3% SL组 | 391.4±40.0a | 176.1±12.1a | 3.0±0.2a | 546.4±61.0a | 126.8±10.5a | 3.3±0.3a |
| 5% SL组 | 425.8±36.5a | 162.5±9.3a | 3.2±0.3a | 566.2±60.3a | 120.6±8.8a | 3.3±0.3a |
| F | 220.541 | 649.043 | 359.121 | 74.546 | 169.454 | 216.725 |
| P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 组别 | 正常精子(n=92) | 弱活力精子(n=64) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROS(AU) | SOD(U/mL) | MDA(nmol/mL) | ROS(AU) | SOD(U/mL) | MDA(nmol/mL) | |
| EY组 | 360.1±40.1a | 195.1±11.5a | 2.5±0.3a | 483.7±51.0a | 146.5±11.5a | 2.6±0.2a |
| 1% SL组 | 378.8±36.3a | 169.1±8.9a | 2.7±0.2a | 510.1±51.4a | 134.1±10.5a | 3.1±0.3a |
| 2% SL组 | 272.0±33.1 | 238.3±14.7 | 1.9±0.2 | 419.1±38.8 | 167.8±15.1 | 2.2±0.2 |
| 3% SL组 | 391.4±40.0a | 176.1±12.1a | 3.0±0.2a | 546.4±61.0a | 126.8±10.5a | 3.3±0.3a |
| 5% SL组 | 425.8±36.5a | 162.5±9.3a | 3.2±0.3a | 566.2±60.3a | 120.6±8.8a | 3.3±0.3a |
| F | 220.541 | 649.043 | 359.121 | 74.546 | 169.454 | 216.725 |
| P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| [1] | Tamburrino L, Traini G, Marcellini A, et al. Cryopreservation of Human Spermatozoa: Functional, Molecular and Clinical Aspects[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24(5):4656. doi: 10.3390/ijms24054656. |
| [2] |
Fu L, Fang F, Guo Y, et al. Combined Analysis of the Transcriptome, Proteome and Metabolome in Human Cryopreserved Sperm[J]. World J Mens Health, 2024, 42(3):610-619. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.230091.
pmid: 38164029 |
| [3] |
Wnuk D. The basis of cell cryopreservation[J]. Postepy Biochem, 2022, 68(4):353-365. doi: 10.18388/pb.2021_461.
pmid: 36649141 |
| [4] | Beauvais D, Berthaut I, Cabannes-Hamy A, et al. Semen Cryopreservation in Adolescents and Young Adults with Hematologic Diseases: from Bed to Benchside[J]. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol, 2022, 11(4):389-393. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2021.0137. |
| [5] | Zhang L, Jiang C, Wang X, et al. Freezing Hu ram semen: influence of different penetrating cryoprotectants and egg yolk level on the post-thaw quality of sperm[J]. Anim Biosci, 2024, 37(9):1548-1557. doi: 10.5713/ab.24.0167. |
| [6] | Mahadevan M, Trounson AO. Effect of cryoprotective media and dilution methods on the preservation of human spermatozoa[J]. Andrologia, 1983, 15(4):355-366. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.1983.tb00152.x. |
| [7] | Fatima Z, Itrat N, Israr B, et al. Therapeutic Efficacy of Soy-Derived Bioactives: A Systematic Review of Nutritional Potency, Bioactive Therapeutics, and Clinical Biomarker Modulation[J]. Foods, 2025, 14(19):3447. doi: 10.3390/foods14193447. |
| [8] |
Sicchieri F, Silva AB, Santana VP, et al. Phosphatidylcholine and L-acetyl-carnitine-based freezing medium can replace egg yolk and preserves human sperm function[J]. Transl Androl Urol, 2021, 10(1):397-407. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1004.
pmid: 33532327 |
| [9] | Abdel-Ghani MA, El-Sharawy ME, Zaid EK, et al. Low concentrations of soybean lecithin nanoparticles had a positive impact on Holstein bulls' cryopreserved semen[J]. Reprod Domest Anim, 2024, 59(5):e14613. doi: 10.1111/rda.14613. |
| [10] | 世界卫生组织. 世界卫生组织人类精液检查与处理实验室手册[M]. 5版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2011. |
| [11] |
Farrokhi Z, Sharafi M, Hezavehei M, et al. The Effects of Glycerophospholipid Nanomicelles on the Cryotolerance of Frozen-Thawed Rooster Sperm[J]. Biopreserv Biobank, 2023, 21(6):593-598. doi: 10.1089/bio.2022.0135.
pmid: 36637861 |
| [12] | He M, Xu J, Sun L, et al. Optimization of Cholesterol-Loaded Cyclodextrin Combined with Soybean Lecithin as a Cryoprotectant for Rooster Sperm[J]. Vet Sci, 2024, 11(12):647. doi: 10.3390/vetsci11120647. |
| [13] | Li R, Zhao H, Li B, et al. Soybean lecithin and cholesterol-loaded cyclodextrin in combination to enhances the cryosurvival of dairy goat semen[J]. Cryobiology, 2023, 112:104557. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2023.104557. |
| [14] | Fouladvandi R, Masoudi AA, Totonchi M, et al. Effects of different extenders on epigenetic patterns and functional parameters of bull sperm during cryopreservation process[J]. Reprod Domest Anim, 2024, 59(5):e14570. doi: 10.1111/rda.14570. |
| [15] | Osuagwuh UI, Allai L, Raji LO, et al. Potential use of soy lecithin or butylated hydroxytoluene as an alternative to powdered egg yolk for ram semen cryopreservation[J]. Reprod Domest Anim, 2024, 59(5):e14585. doi: 10.1111/rda.14585. |
| [16] | 黄晨, 李春阳, 臧荣鑫, 等. 大豆卵磷脂对绵羊精液低温保存效果的影响[J]. 中国草食动物科学, 2024, 44(1):25-28. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3887.2024.00.005. |
| [17] | 赵霞, 爱伦高娃, 张春华, 等. 不同稀释保护液对羊精子在4 ℃低温保存条件下品质影响的探索研究[J]. 畜牧兽医杂志, 2024, 43(5):32-36,39. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1004-6704.2024.05.006. |
| [18] | Huang CH, Chen CH, Huang TK, et al. Design of a gradient-rheotaxis microfluidic chip for sorting of high-quality Sperm with progressive motility[J]. iScience, 2023, 26(8):107356. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107356. |
| [19] |
Javaheri Barfourooshi H, Asadzadeh N, Masoudi R. The mitochondria-targeted antioxidant "MitoQ" preserves quality and reproductive performance of ram spermatozoa cryopreserved in soybean lecithin-based extender[J]. Theriogenology, 2023, 208:71-76. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2023.05.032.
pmid: 37301168 |
| [20] | Yin T, Yue X, Li Q, et al. The Association Between the Levels of Oxidative Stress Indicators (MDA, SOD, and GSH) in Seminal Plasma and the Risk of Idiopathic Oligo-asthenotera-tozoospermia: Does Cu or Se Level Alter the Association?[J]. Biol Trace Elem Res, 2024, 202(7):2941-2953. doi: 10.1007/s12011-023-03888-6. |
| [21] | Sengupta P, Pinggera GM, Calogero AE, et al. Oxidative stress affects sperm health and fertility-Time to apply facts learned at the bench to help the patient: Lessons for busy clinicians[J]. Reprod Med Biol, 2024, 23(1):e12598. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12598. |
| [22] | Lin X, Guo J, Wang X, et al. Upregulation of miR-151a-5p in high DFI sperm induces DNA damage and mitochondrial dysfunction by targeting INPP4B and VAMP1[J]. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 2025, 23(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12958-025-01474-0. |
| [23] | Tachibana R, Takeuchi H, Yoshikawa-Terada K, et al. Carboxylated Poly-L-lysine Potentially Reduces Human Sperm DNA Fragmentation after Freeze-Thawing, and Its Function Is Enhanced by Low-Dose Resveratrol[J]. Cells, 2023, 12(22):2585. doi: 10.3390/cells12222585. |
| [24] | Ghania AS, Abdelghafar AE, Sosa ARM, et al. Effect of soy lecithin and green tea extract supplementation in Tris-based extender on cryopreserved buffalo bull semen quality[J]. Benha Veterinary Med J, 2024, 47(2):52-57. doi: 10.21608/bvmj.2024.338058.1895. |
| [1] | CHEN Jia-lang, ZHANG Yun-shan, WANG Guang-teng, PANG Ze-hui. The Impact of Sperm DNA Fragmentation on Intrauterine Insemination Outcomes and Intervention Strategies [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2026, 45(1): 40-44. |
| [2] | HUANG Ru, JIN Meng-han, ZHONG Yu-nong, WANG Ke-han, MENG Qing-xia. Research Progress on DNA Methylation of Gametes, Embryos and Offspring from Assisted Reproductive Technology [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2026, 45(1): 45-48. |
| [3] | SHI Xue-ying, YANG Jin-ji, FU Hao, HU Chun-xiu. The Mechanism of High Fat Diet-Induced Sperm Morphological Abnormalities [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2025, 44(6): 490-495. |
| [4] | ZHANG Kuan-jian, YANG Dan-dan, JIA Cong, XIONG Min, ZHANG Zhi-guo. The Application Prospects of Nanoparticles in the in Vitro Culture and Cryopreservation of Animal Oocytes [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2025, 44(4): 316-319. |
| [5] | BIAN Hai-jun, ZHANG Xin-yue, FENG Rui-zhi, QIAN Yun. The Influence of Sperm Factors on Embryonic Development [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2025, 44(2): 150-154. |
| [6] | WANG Lin, XU Jian. Influencing Factors of Ovarian Tissue Vitrification and Transplantation Techniques [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2025, 44(1): 47-53. |
| [7] | LIU Yu-bin, XUE Tao, CHEN Qin-yi, HE Xin-yun, LIU Yue. Environmental Stressors Regulating Sperm Non-Coding RNA Involved in Intergenerational Inheritance [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2025, 44(1): 65-70. |
| [8] | XU Shan, MENG Jiang-ping. Research Progress on Sperm DNA Damage in Assisted Reproductive Technology [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2025, 44(1): 71-77. |
| [9] | ZHAO An-qi, LIU Lin, TAN Xiao-fang. HPV Transmission through Sperm and Its Impact on Early Embryonic Development [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(4): 328-331. |
| [10] | WU Zhu-lian, WANG Cai-zhu, ZHOU Hong, CHEN Huan-hua, LIN Ruo-yun, SHU Jin-hui. Research Progress on the Cryopreservation of Small Numbers of Human Sperm [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2024, 43(3): 222-227. |
| [11] | CHANG Tian-qing, WU Hua, FENG Rui-zhi, QIAN Yun. Research Progress of Proteins Related to Sperm Acrosome Development [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2023, 42(1): 44-49. |
| [12] | LIANG Hui-zhi, WANG Zhi-hong, YANG Pan. Effect of Cryopreservation Time on the Outcome of Frozen-Thawed Embryos Transplant [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2022, 41(5): 370-374. |
| [13] | HUANG Shao-feng, NIU Xiang-li, LIN Zhong, ZHU Xue-hong, BIN Li, LIU Shu-cen. Injury Factors of Vitrification Cryopreservation and Transplantation of Ovarian Cortex [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2022, 41(4): 308-312. |
| [14] | JI Hui, DONG Li, ZHAO Chun, LING Xiu-feng, DING Hui. Immediate Versus Delayed Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer in Patients Following a Freeze-All IVF-ET Cycle [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2022, 41(3): 189-194. |
| [15] | XU Yu-wei, LI Wen-jing, MAO Xin-yi, MA Zhuo-yao, DING Zhi-de. The Role of Sperm TsRNA in Paternal Inheritance [J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2022, 41(1): 37-41. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||